AI generated, maybe?
"Oh, am I supposed to kiss it?"
the LLM's dataset uses only public domain and openly licensed material.
I'm curious about the specifics of all this. Probably the most well-known "openly licensed" sort of licenses (aside from licenses specifically intended only for software) are the Creative Commons family of licenses, all of which require attribution. So then the question would become "if you've used any of my CC-licensed content in training this model, am I attributed somewhere?" If so, surely the list is extremely long. Or maybe Creative Commons wasn't "openly"-enough licensed and they excluded all CC-licensed content from the training set.
Also, the public domain is definitely strongly biased toward very old content. You'd think a lot of the answers you got from that LLM would be based on some very outdated information. Maybe they specifically limited it to (or at least adjusted weights or something to make it prefer) recent materials in the public domain.
But then the article also says:
It performed about as well as Meta's similarly sized Llama 2-7B from 2023.
On top of all this, I have to say that the LLM sphere really is just scams piled on top of scams, so it's fairly probable either that it doesn't perform anywhere near as well as Llama 2-7B and they're just lying or that actually Llama 2-7B (and indeed all LLMs as well) is just total shit too.
Nice speedrun strat.
describing IntelliJ as "good".
Shots fired back. 😈
No, finite doesn't necessarily mean it has a border. The surface of the earth has finite area, but one can theoretically travel along the surface of the earth forver in any one direction without ever hitting any border. (You'd of course eventually return to where you started, but not hit a border.) The universe may well be the same way. A "hypersphere" if you will. That is, maybe theoretically if you traveled in "a straight line" forever, you'd eventually find yourself where you started rather than ever hitting an edge or boundary or border.
Now listen here you little shit
First off, it's not certain that space is infinite, but I'd say it's probable.
But even if it's infinite, infinity has some unusual properties that make this make sense. For this, I'm going to borrow from Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel.
Imagine a hotel with an infinite number of rooms numbered 0, 1, 2, 3... with no end. The room numbers (and rooms) just keep going on forever. And imagine that hotel has no vacancy. That is, an infinite number of guests are already staying there and there are no hotel rooms that are vacant. But then, someone shows up and asks the hotel clerk for a room. The clerk, being a clever fellow, has all the current patrons change rooms to the room numbered one higher than the one they were previously in. (The person in room 0 moves to room 1. The person in room 1 moves to room 2. etc.) That operation is one that can go on forever. (It couldn't go on forever in a hotel with a finite number of rooms, but in an infinite hotel, an infinite number of patrons can move to the next room up and not a single one of the infinite number of patrons will be unable to do so for lack of a room numbered one greater than their previous room.) Then, the clerk books room 0 for the new arrival. But also notice that the number of patrons before the new arrival is the same as the total number of patrons including the new arrival.
Said another way, ∞+1=∞
. (Not only that, but ∞+∞=∞
. Thinking about the previous thought experiment, if an infinite number of people arrived to a fully occupied infinite hotel, the clerk could have all the existing patrons move to the room that was double their previous room number and then book all of the infinite number of new arrivals in all the odd-numbered rooms.)
Final thoughts:
- I don't know where you got "the cause of [space expanding?] is apparently dark matter being created." Maybe I'm just uninformed, but I haven't heard of that. (There's the idea of "dark energy" that IIRC is related to space expanding, but I'm not sure I've heard dark matter used as an explanation of that.)
- Some of your question kindof implies that "space" is expanding "into" some... meta-space or something. Like you're envisioning our space existing inside another space. And part of your question is about how the "meta-spacetime" can expand infinitely to accommodate our space. I don't think that's certain. It's entirely possible that's not really an accurate way to view what might be "outside" our space. (I'm not sure "outside our space" is really a meaningful concept.)
(I hope this doesn't need said, but just to make sure, to anyone reading, don't take Skeezix's comment seriously. It's satire.)
His base is a cult. They'll retroactively decide that pardoning him was a good thing if that happens. That's what they always do.
TootSweet
0 post score0 comment score
Looks like hallucinating "aGeNtIc Ai" to me. The text itself is too clean to be stable diffusion or DALL-E or whatever, so I'm guessing it's not exactly that, but it's far too weird not make me think it might be some kind of misbehaving algorithm.
I haven't looked at your post history yet to see if all of your posts are similarly nonsensical, so I still don't know if I'm responding to a human.
To be fair, similarly nonsensical posts existed before AI. Maybe that's just your thing. It's definitely not really what this (or any other, really) community is for, however.