[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I've seen this happen with 20 and 30 year olds.

Its an entire learned skill that a large segment of the population never learned.

... unfortunately, much like reading and writing, these days.

But yeah, the idea that... you can move your position in 3d, with wasd or a dpad or a stick... and also orient your view angle with a mouse or stick ... at the same time?

This is utterly baffling and disorienting to a lot of people who've never played a first person perspective game before.

Its ... part of why AAA games are more often than not third person, in the last decade.

Its easier to pickup for a noobie, because you have a constant point of reference, you can always see the avatar of the player, camera movements are less sensitive and less drastic because you have a wider FOV.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

... or a better knowledge of your own anatomy and how angles work.

Thats like 4 to 4 1/2 inches to get to the Z button.

If your girlfriend can tickle your pickle, you should be able to uh, handle the plunge here.

Just relax, and say 'Ahh'.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Goldeneye and Perfect Dark both actually have a set of control schemas...

Where you play with two of these, at the same time.

As well as a number of different one handed configurations, that essentially make it possible to play those games with hands on the left and right prongs, left and center, or right and center.

You may or may not find some of them wonky, but ... yeah, it was a perhaps needlessly versatile design, though also very innovative, though also a bit weird.

I'm pretty sure it was literally the first home game console controller with an analog stick, an actual true analog stick, not counting joysticks with huge bases and a button or two.


This is also the same era where the early Mario party games had minigames where you were supposed to spin thr control stick in a circle very fast.

So uh, beyond that being terrible for the controller...

A good number of kids figured out that you can just grip the center prong and then palm the stick, move it much much faster... but also tearing through your own hand and giving you blisters.

So Nintendo stopped putting those kinds of minigames in Mario Party, and basically issued a health advisory telling people not to do that.

https://www.cnet.com/culture/nintendo-offers-glove-to-prevent-joystick-injuries/

... Apparently they actually got sued.

... and offered to give the injured parties... gloves.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

No it isn't.

Be a better parent.

Or, better yet: Don't have kids you aren't capable of raising properly.

If this all sounds too complicated, you aren't a capable parent.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

... How does anyone see something like this as anything other than the deranged rantings of an utterly insane person?

Like, this is just an actual racist angry drunk grandpa/uncle rant, the reason why you either dread or just don't go to family events anymore.

What a truly wretched person.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

No, we would not win an invasion of Taiwan.

Realistically, no one would, it would probably basically result in either a nuclear exchange or some kind of mass infrastructure denial kind of attack, around many parts of the world.

But uh, we only have usually about 3 carrier groups in/around China/Taiwan at any given time.

And... our wargame scenarios only look maybe/probably winnable for fending off a Chinese invasion of Taiwan... if we have all of regional our allies to rely on.

If they are all against us, we lose badly.

China has more missiles and aircraft than we can hope to overcome without allies.

If... we were going to... do, what, a marine / paratrooper invasion... of Taiwan...

Where in the fuck would we stage that?

Okinawa?

You can't move the numbers of troops needed to do an invasion of Taiwan without a lot of people noticing... and we'd immediately become enemies of all the places we could launch the assault from, if we somehow did manage to move a few hundred thousand infantry without being noticed.

Like, it took us around a year to move everything over the countries neighboring Kuwait and Iraq, back in the Gulf War.

You can't just steam a marine invasion flotilla from Hawaii to Taiwan.

Everyone has satellites. They'd see it. When we got near a staging port, world news would be going insane with 'wtf is the US doing with this armada?'

This is why I said its like the dumbest possible thing we could do.

We are pretty much guaranteed to lose.

We could pull off something like that against smaller Central or smaller South American countries... not Taiwan.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago

You are the one positing the idea the an underling clerk wrote it.

I am the one saying its possible that did not happen and it was just written by, you know, the AG, the guy whose name is on the letterhead.

The point of doing it advance is to have it ready to go when the time comes.

And sometimes, plans change a bit, and he accidentally forgot to remove his early draft.

This really isn't that hard of a concept to grasp.

Our entire convo chain stems from me saying 'maybe it was not a clerk that wrote it.'

You seem to be incapable of considering this, conceptually.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The US could occupy any country on earth (maybe not China, without some Roman level war crimes)

Hahaha, no.

The US could invade maybe two countries with a GDP around 1/4 ours, and actually persistently occupy them for maybe a few years.

Our economy is crashing extremely rapidly, we've functionally lost the ability to build new warships or aircraft in anything approaching a timely or affordable manner... and, because we have decided to tariff and threaten or militarily attack basically everyone everyone...

All of our supply chains for a great deal of our fancy schmancy military tech doesn't work any more.

You cant build complex guided missiles and computer chips and sensors that aim them or night vision goggles without access to a wide array or rare earth minerals, most of which China basically has a near total monopoly of.

We don't have the native industrial base to build anywhere near everything we would need to, to actually autarkicly sustain our own war machine.

... we can't even feed or house our population at a reasonable cost anymore, our internal infrastructure is physically falling apart, and our cybersecurity is beyond laughably comprimised.

There is no way this country would 'win' trying to occupy Taiwan.

China + Japan + SK + all of goddamned SEA + potentially even Australia vs US = we fucking lose hard.

We may be able to get away with some neo-Monroe Doctrine bullshit for a while.

And keep funding genocides in the ME, and doing random airstrikes and spec ops shennanigans in poorer countries.

Thats about it.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 day ago

Ow my brain.

Have you ever had a dream that you, um, you had, your, you- you could, you’ll do, you- you wants, you, you could do so, you- you’ll do, you could- you, you want, you want them to do you so much you could do anything?

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago

Shhh you'll upset the quantum mystics that need to believe magic is real!

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This was my first thought as well, this... this has to be taking place in Utah, in some way of another.

Gideon Dunster is such a Mormon name that it is actually comical to me.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ok, rare to see such an explicit kind of Great Filter / Idiot Test play out at scale, but here we go!

Anybody who is still using Discord after it requires you to personally directly link your drivers liscense or w/e to it, well, they're fine with every government apparatus of any kind knowing everything they say and do on Discord.

Good luck to those glorious morons, truly, good luck.

You are going to need it.

Super, duper hope you're not queer or trans or neurodivergent.

... you... think the 23 concentration camps currently being built by ICE / FEMA are ... only for migrants?

Brown people?

Well you trust the current fascist regime a lot more than I do.

127
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Intrepid Studios has apparently shut down, leaving MMORPG fans wondering if they will get their refund after supporting Ashes of Creation.

...

Over the weekend, sharp-eyed gamers noticed that many Intrepid Studios employees had changed their LinkedIn status to “Open For Work.” A telling post from Director of Communications and Marketing Margaret Krohn on January 31st said the “chapter was coming to a close.” After emotionally thanking the Ashes of Creation community, she said she doesn’t “have the words” and this “wasn’t what [she] expected.”

This was followed by a Discord message from Intrepid Studios’ CEO and founder Steven Sharif that essentially solidified the studio’s closing. He said that “control of the company” had shifted away from him and the board was making decisions he “could not ethically agree” with.

“As a result, I chose to resign in protest rather than lend my name or authority to decisions I could not ethically support,” Sharif wrote to fans. “Following my resignation, much of the senior leadership team resigned.”

This led the board to make mass layoffs. Sharif didn’t want to go into further detail since there are ongoing legal matters between him and the board. However, he told the let-down players that he was “incredibly dismayed” by how it all went down.

...

On February 2nd, the studio will send a WARN Act to all employees, letting them go and shutting down operations. Meanwhile, payroll scheduled for February 1st was allegedly unable to be processed due to the company’s financial constraints.

In late 2025, Ballard Spahr of Sara Systems LLC issued an $850,000 lawsuit against Intrepid Studios. The cloud provider is alleging that Intrepid Studios has nearly $1 million in unpaid fees. As speculations began that Ashes of Creation was a possible near-debt scam that jumped onto Discord in a last-ditch effort to make more money from gamers, Sharif claimed that contract disputes are “common” in business. He said that the matter will likely be dissolved.

...

In the original Kickstarter campaign from 2016 to 2017, Sharif promised to refund all backers in full if the game didn’t launch. While this was not a legally binding statement, many gamers are wondering whether Sharif rushed to release the game on Steam to get around the previous statement. Now that the game has made it to Steam, albeit unfinished, Sharif wouldn’t feel morally obligated to give back the millions his studio made from it.

On social media, Ashes of Creation backers are still demanding a refund. A lot of gamers spent thousands on the game, between the $500 package and in-game cosmetics. While others are calling these backers “suckers” for supporting a game that seemed so blatantly suspicious, it still hasn’t taken the heat off Sharif.

At this point, it doesn’t seem likely that Ashes of Creation supporters will get any of their money back. It’s perfectly legal for a Kickstarter project to shut down even after raising money, although if there is proven misconduct, a refund could be possible. However, this level of grift – going on 10 years – seems pretty tricky to navigate and legally prove.


[I've not quoted the entire article, just the parts I found most pertinent]


[My own comment:]

... yup.

That's all, folks!

Game over.

Seems worth noting that... as best I can tell, there is no board of directors.

The whole point of AoC's funding model... was to avoid having a board to answer to.

... ???


UPDATE:

Ok, I'm watching Kira's video on this now as well.

Apparently,... there is a board.

He's being sparse with details, to not get into legal trouble, to not overstep, but he's saying he's gotten a good deal of info leaked to him...

"You're going to find out there was a board."

He's focusing on how badly all the employees have been fucked, how there seems to have been some kind of corporate coup, that the game is now owned by a private equity group, that the original dev team has essentially all been fired without warning, development has been outsourced to some overseas team, and that we should wait for more facts.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=B0ewbHYWL7s

8
Edwin Starr - War (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/classicrock@lemmy.world

... yeah, seems appropriate today.

War, huh, yeah

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, uh-huh, uh-huh

War, huh, yeah

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, say it again, y'all

War, huh, good god

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, listen to me

Oh war, I despise

'Cause it means destruction of innocent lives

War means tears to thousands of mothers' eyes

When their sons go off to fight and lose their lives

I said, war, huh, good god, y'all

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, say it again

War, huh, whoa-oh-whoa-oh, Lord

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, listen to me

War, it ain't nothing but a heartbreak

War, friend only to the undertaker

Oh, war, is an enemy to all mankind

The thought of war blows my mind

War has caused unrest within the younger generation

Induction then destruction, who wants to die?

Oh, war, huh, good god, y'all

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, say it, say it, say it

War, huh, uh-huh, yeah, uh

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, listen to me

War, it ain't nothing but a heartbreaker

War, it got one friend, that's the undertaker

Oh, war has shattered many a young man's dreams

Made him disabled, bitter and mean

Life is much too short and precious to spend fighting wars these days

War can't give life, it can only take it away

Oh, war, huh, good god, y'all

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, say it again

War, huh, whoa-oh-whoa-oh, Lord

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing, listen to me

War, it ain't nothing but a heartbreaker

War, friend only to the undertaker

Peace, love and understanding, tell me

Is there no place for them today?

They say we must fight to keep our freedom

But lord knows there's got to be a better way

Oh, war, huh, good god, y'all

What is it good for?

You tell me, (nothing) say it, say it, say it, say it

War, huh, good god, yeah, huh

What is it good for?

Stand up and shout it (nothing)

90

Lost the things some years back, apparently long enough back that I'm not allowed to use my old rx.

So, got a new rx, new exam, picked out new frames, should be here by Christmas.

1

... Does it basically have to be cozy/cartoony/lighthearted?

Or would games like RimWorld, DwarfFortress, Kenshi, Endzone - A World Apart, Project Zomboid... would they count?

I guess uh yeah, what are the actual bounds of what ya'll would call a 'life-simulation game'?

Apologies if I missed some thread going into more detail than the sidebar, but I don't see anything stickied from my mobile app.

1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/usa@midwest.social

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

24
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

18
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/news@beehaw.org

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

24
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

176
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/world@lemmy.world

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

44
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/gaming@lemmy.zip

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

99
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/pcgaming@lemmy.world

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

76
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

view more: next ›

sp3ctr4l

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 10 months ago