[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Except as written, it's only a path to knowing who all children are, not the adults who are usually the ones advocating for taxing billionaires. Sure, they might change the law, but that doesn't make starting it this way any less bizarre. I don't understand what reason there would be to make it harder to make a child account than an adult account by only IDing children.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago

This is bizarre. Why would they force people under 18 to verify their birth date, but if you're over 18 you can just enter your birth date with no verification?

Usually you only care about verifying the age of people over 18. What's this law trying to accomplish by only verifying children?

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 7 months ago

If we're being pedantic fungi have neither gender nor sex, they have "mating types". But yeah, mating types are more analogous to sexes than genders. Fungi would have to have some level of social experience to have gender.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 8 months ago

Let's get MasterCard on the case

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 2 years ago

Little known fact about D&D succubi: since 4e succubi can change sexes freely. Incubi and succubi are just different forms of the same monster.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 339 points 2 years ago

So this is just a thing now? Removing media from the world?

They found out it works so now it's gonna become a trend.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 2 years ago

It's kind of ironic taking a project that's already written in Rust and writing a replacement for it in Java.

Usually things get ported to Rust, not the other way around.

77
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/main@lemmy.blahaj.zone

It seems that the issue was resolved behind closed doors, so it could have been resolved behind closed doors to begin with, and then if the defederation was to go ahead simply announce the defederation.

Making an announcement "it will be defederated in 48 hours" made for this weird countdown drama thread (we even had programming.dev people show up and be sad about defederation!) that didn't really go anywhere, and then y'all just locked it when we refederated and made it clear that you were never interested in input and you'll be running the instance as you please (which is well within your rights of course). So what was the point of the thread?

I can see how it is nice to have warning if a community you're involved in is going to be defederated, but it also drags drama to our nice little corner of the fediverse, and pins it at the top of our feeds for all to see. In fact it shows up as the top of every feed for me, Local, All, and Subscribed. I can't get away from it.

Every time these threads show up they end up blowing up. Honestly, if you didn't make these threads, I wouldn't care who you defederate. But because the thread exists, I have to come in and I have to have an opinion. That's a personal issue and I recognize that, but I would hazard a guess that I'm not the only one. People who have never interacted with Blahaj nor the instance getting defederated show up in these threads sometimes. These threads invite drama, and for me personally, whenever they come up they make this space feel significantly less safe and make me want to leave Lemmy as a whole because it feels like it's just nonstop defederation drama for days at a time, but it's pinned at the top of my feed.

Maybe these threads actually provide utility, and I should just take these threads as a sign I should take a break from the Internet for a bit. But to me, they just seem like they're all downsides.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 161 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This alone doesn't seem like something worth defederating over. It seems like they just got baited hard by Hexbear. Did the comment chain get censored? It doesn't seem like there's much active transphobia here, just ignorance of the issues at worst.

From my cursory read, the only thing that reads as actually transphobic to me is when they say "And getting offended by it really isn’t helping your case here." in response to someone getting mad at being referred to as "they", and that itself was due to technical issues and not transphobia.

Frankly, one angry snapback and a slap fight with Hexbear doesn't seem worth defederating over. I'm all for defederating bigots, but I don't want hapless allies getting caught in the crossfire.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 2 years ago

The annoying thing about that is that if you don't long rest enough in BG3, you miss a lot of story beats. Unlike tabletop, it wants you to long rest, and will punish you for not long resting rather than punishing you for long resting.

I'm doing a second playthrough and I'm realizing just how much I missed during my first playthrough where I used my tabletop mindset of "rest only when absolutely necessary". And even then sometimes watching other people's playthroughs I see scenes I never saw.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 2 years ago

This is a weird one because despite being a "good" spell, it entails the mass murder of innocent neutrals. It really doesn't seem like a good action to me.

It seems like anyone who was okay with this would fall to neutral or evil simply by virtue of being okay with mass murder, and in turn fall victim to the Great Neutral Purge.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 2 years ago

I don't think I'd describe hexbear as polite, they seem to get pretty rowdy, even antagonistic at times. Otherwise I agree though. It would be a shame to cut off one of the largest queer friendly instances out there.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 2 years ago

It's ironic this went down over adorableporn and not fauxbait

4

I know you're supposed to pronounce it along the lines of "blo-hi", but the Anglicized "blahaj" is so hard to resist!

view more: next ›

melmi

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago