[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 19 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I think it's AI slop. But based on all the shit that the fascists have been typing for years as training material

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 9 points 16 hours ago

I agree your tactic would be better, probably more useful and likely more effective, but my question is if my initial reaction of disgust was grounded in a similar process as initial disgusts at "cracker" or not. Do we define subimperialism as lesser and thus less abhorrent or not? Or do we support the use of "cracker" because we think its useful? I'd never considered these things before now tbh, I just found it funny that white people hate the term.

I have a lot of questions and few answers, I'm realizing

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 11 points 16 hours ago

My position on slurs is they're mostly useless, but I, for example, won't tell a black person to stop calling white people slurs

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 12 points 16 hours ago

I get this perspective entirely for westerners, but this is a Chinese guy posting about China from China. Just in English because its Twitter. There the circumstances have to be considered differently. I'm still very unsure of how to feel personally about the use of the slur by chinese people, but I'm just not really convinced that "America is the bigger empire in the world" really has any impact on the fact that japanese settler colonialism 90 years ago is still impacting China now.

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 7 points 16 hours ago

I guess if we understand the world as layers of empire with further internal cores, then American racism against japanese is still structural, yes. But then japanese racism of Chinese is also structural, so then chinese have to act differently with regards to japanese because America is Uber racist?

I agree though, I think slurs are generally weak and just useless and only harmful. But yet I am not gonna tell a black person that about cracker

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I have to be honest, I don't follow your post really at all. Idk if its my English, if so sorry, but seems like there's a ton of non-specified terms making this hard to follow. "The identity": idk which one you're talking about. "Didnt fucking do": who didn't do something? And what didn't they do?

Then the last sentence, is that asking me the question? I didn't do anything much tbh, but idk what that has to do with this lol

I hope this doesn't sound mean, I don't intend that. But I can't really tell what standpoint you're taking at all and so am just kind of confused

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 17 points 16 hours ago

But I hear this more often from like white Americans saying "its not all whites, just attack the state of white supremacy". That's why I started thinking about it so much in this case. The immediate reaction of "that's racially essentialized and thus always evil" is not something we accept against white people in the imperial core. Or at least I don't.

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 17 points 17 hours ago

Ok I had this question earlier and didn't know how to ask, but it at least fits this post somewhat.

A Chinese person I follow said in english something like 'if piracy hurts [slur for japanese, cutting off the last 5 letters] then I should do it more'. Is this like black people calling white people crackers and thus acceptable? I wasn't sure what the broader consensus about that specific relationship was. Japan did do some horrific racist shit and still performs systemic racism... sooo... idk what you think?

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 20 points 20 hours ago

I also don't remember any confirmation! Chat, was there confirmation?

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 31 points 1 day ago

That first paragraph needs to be copy-pasted to like a million different arguments online. Well worded. It's what I've tried to say in 10x as many words on many occasions

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

Hey you, you're a menshevik!

[-] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

Shitttttt I was coming to make the exact same book recommendation and a similar comment. You're a good badger comrade-fly

25
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

Edit2: the ratio is amazing. I'm exhausted. This has quadrupled my hexbear time for the day and I will be limiting myself for a bit lol. I feel like we got somewhere in a couple of good threads thanks to Hellinkilla and ratboy. Good luck, comrades.

Edit: the rant wasn't clear enough. In Previous struggles users have expressed frustrations with how mods/admin decisions are made. I would like to discuss how they are made and hear from them. Mods have also stated before that they wish we could be better, I'd like to hear how and know how they think this should be approached.

Rant/effort post coming:

What's the follow up to the recent problems with how mods/admins have handled recent issues? Did I miss something? Can we get some explanations about how this site is structured and what roles we see for admins/mods generally?

history of struggle session, not necessary but gives context


We had a fairly large and fairly one-sided struggle session a couple weeks ago. Z_Poster was banned (and still is, as far as I know) and the emoji was added. Some users (thinking of @hellinkella, smong others) did some effort to really parse out where the pain points were and who was involved (largely Zionism inherent in some positions, Jewish exceptionalism). Only the emoji and banning occurred with no other promises/ideas from mods/admins.

There then followed a leak of mod logs where opinions were still very different than the userbase. I would encourage people not to open it or ask for it, please, and especially not to share it. But I think a significant amount of us did see messages that, regardless of context, gave an image of admins/mods that think the userbase hates them, disagreed with the userbase in significant ways, and which wants to steer us in a better direction. The mod chat was also absurdly active at the time, but there's been little talk about what WAS discussed, only discussions about what was missed, where more context is needed, and things that were not done in a timely manner. This was not further discussed. (Personally I'm super appreciative of you all, doing work I don't want to do on a website I enjoy thoroughly, and don't hate any of you--including previous ones I've argued with, but would like to see some changes which will follow below and hopefully other comrades will add to it/change it for the better).

We had an EM/POC post which was tangential to that, but where there seemed to be large support for the userbase with regards to the ideological differences between mods/admins and the broader userbase. There was also a banning for which apologies followed quickly, but which indicates the structural failure more generally. There were of course other topics covered, which I won't speak on here. I didn't see any solutions proposed and accepted, from any of the topics relevant to this post. (Please correct me if I read this thread wrong, don't want to speak for you, EM/POC comrades.)

Was there a follow up? Is that coming? Is the discussion behind the curtain of the mod chat? I understand you all have lives, so don't spend all your time working on this, but some knowledge of how you're working would be good. Otherwise it feels like purposeful pushing back of feedback/decisions so that we will forget the passionate feelings or give up. If that's the goal, it's a horrible strategy and should just be explicitly told. "3 months after a struggle session is the earliest we will make changes in processes" is better than nothing.

I would also recommend we have an open discussion about the direction of the site. It seems the mods/admins have indicated to have better ideas for what we can be (I remember this from the "dunk" discussions too), but have not made clear what their position in that is. Enforcers? A vanguard (with our input as leading determinant)? A different vanguard (against our input for but in our interests)? Theoreticians that have the ideas but want the users to take the lead? Knowing this would make clearer how to interact with you, and how to make our experiences better. Maybe we do need growth and improvement, but we haven't been clear about how, and talking down is how most have experienced that. I already love this place, so when I'm frustrated I don't think of leaving. But that's not universal

16

I'm no expert on Iran, so I was hoping some knowledgeable people here could give some context. I find it hard to figure out the speaker's exact strategy from the discussion. Any thoughts?

view more: next ›

MLRL_Commie

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago