[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 17 points 2 hours ago

"Nice oil tanker you got there.....be a shame if something happened to it...."

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Tbh, imo the only context one rly needs is what the SDP was (a socialist party), and that Marx was specifically asked by someone in it (Liebknecht iirc) to criticise the programmes reformist tendencies. It could also be beneficial to give folks a copy of the programme, its not very long.

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 27 points 4 days ago

-Kautsky about Lenin, 1916

Too many marxists take a kautskyite position on imperialism (its a set of policies a state can decide to choose or not choose) instead of lenin's position (its a whole era of capitalism predicated on monopolies and exporting capital)

30

finished reading this book last night, was pretty interesting. Tries to create an "autistic marxism". Imo it lacks engagement with 1)bipoc, 2) global south and 3) exploitation (though Chapman at least acknowledges the gaps), but otherwise great analysis of the connections between disability and capitalism particularly in the global north over the last 80ish yearz. I also do like how he draws on the connections between disability and surplus population

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 59 points 1 week ago

We are already seeing actual material changes e.g. several euro states refusing the US their air space and bases

I hate being optimistic bc of the risk of being disappointed, but it rly does feel we're at a moment of massive imperial collapse

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 90 points 1 month ago

FUCK YOU KHRUSHCHEV FUCK YOU FUCK YOUR DAMN PACIFICISM.THIS IS WHERE IT LEADS God fucking damn it Hopefully this is more hot air. Fuck

22

Rly shit takes from Engels here [Engels - The Magyar Struggle] Apparently there's worse yet to come in "Democratic Pan-Slavism"

Its also a total reversal from his position in septemberish 1848, when he was castigating germans for their chauvanism being the cause of slavs opposing revolution

69

Reading this like "nope, sorry bud all ur hopes and dreams are gonna be crushed next year" Poor marx marx-doomer

30

Marx has been maintaining this nonviolent resistance stance since the first article in Neue Rheinische Zeitung back in June, in part bc he believed the reactionaries would definitely lose

However, counterrevolution rallies and two days later Marx admits he was wrong: [Marx - Confessions of a Noble Soul]

And two days after that, Marx is explicitly advocating violent resistence: [Marx - A Decree of Eichmann's]

Source is Marx Engels Collected Works vol8. Its very interesting to see Marx and Engels operating as agitators/organisers rather than theorists

51

From Marx Engels Collected Works vol7

Overall the Neue Rheinische Zeitung articles have been very interesting both theoretically and to see Marx and Engels engaged in organisational work during what they hoped would be THE revolution

22

been reading Barbara Allen's biography of Shlyapnikov. Very well written and sourced almost entirely by archival stuff. But depressing because the workers' opposition gets run roughshod over by basically everyone in power (Lenin, Bukharin, Stalin, Trotsky, Molotov, etcetc). Been wondering what others' have read on the workers' opposition and what your takes are.

The 1930s have been by far the most depressing

But even the late 10s and early 20s have some "dude wtf" moments from leadership imo

Somewhat relatedly, what do folks think of the Democratic Centralists? I've actually never heard of that faction in the 1919-21 debates before

4
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ComradeRat@hexbear.net to c/history@hexbear.net

Very good book on soviet nationalities policy using archival research

This one does a good job of showing how rapidly the (centre) of the party shifted lines on nationalism

Russian opposition to affirmative action programmes was pretty strong

Nationality could be shockingly arbitrary and sudden (and often informed by politics)

Stalin begins to turn towards supporting Russians

collectivisation interacted badly with the nationalities policy

The degree of internal conflicts within the party and soviet bureaucracy was also a huge part of the book.

Ethnic cleansings going on, and there's still tons of affirmative culture programmes running. Weird contradictions

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 66 points 2 months ago

The crimes epstein committed and that the USA and its ally-vassals continue to commit are horrifying and depressing

The fact that he was posting on 4chan, types typos constantly, sending fnaf porn animatics to his friends, despite being so rich is the funniest shit ive seen since musks pathetic livestream from his private jet

1

Paper talking about both the race of Marx, and how Jews were viewed in 19th century Europe

This particular set of quotes from Cuno (a German socialist who moved to Yankland) is particularly neat imo (cw for slur)

5
The Marx He Knew (www.gutenberg.org)

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3265315

Fun little biography of Marx

22
The Marx He Knew (www.gutenberg.org)

Fun little biography of Marx

17
8
[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 59 points 2 years ago

As one of the "sex repulsed ace" folks who gets shot at / tokenised / ignored / etc by all sides

marx-joker thonk-cri blob-stabby

Allosexuality deeply normalised and world is scream. Can't use goddamn pleading emotes anymore because the goddamn allosexuals stole the goddamn emote to mean "bottom" and have turned anxious behaviours, nervousness, etc, into sexualised "bottom behaviour" to contrast "top behaviour" (fucking hell my fellow queers have recreated masculine and feminine gender roles down to their association with sexual behaviour! Infuriating!).

Also its fucking creepy that "pickup line" "stutter/blush/etc" "kissing / etc" being taken as "consent" is BACK but now its fine bc its gay? pooh-wtf Like god i don't want my anxieties taken as "i just secretly want the hornies??"

markkks-juggalo

Oh and the jokes from other queers about turning everyone gay etcetc and i'm like "fuck you i don't wanna be gay i hate this whole sex and romance thing"

So yeah notta fun month here ! ! !

thonk-cri

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 58 points 2 years ago

If the sun destroys capitalism by frying all our technologies i will immediately convert to a sun cultist

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 79 points 2 years ago

Khrushchev? What good has Khrushchev ever done?

-Deng, 1980

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trade. Specifically, trade overseas (sea transport is much faster than land transport to the point of qualitative difference) allowed by long-distance ships. This seems to have had dramatic effects from very early on centred around the Mediterranean (e.g. Bronze age, Hellenic world, Rome, etc for more detail see Broodbank's The Making of the Middle Sea). The secret to merchants' capital and hence merchants' power is found in ch5 of Kapital:

The form of circulation within which money is transformed into capital contradicts all the previously developed laws bearing on the nature of commodities, value, money and even circulation itself. What distinguishes this form from that of the simple circulation of commodities is the inverted order of succession of the two antithetical processes, sale and purchase. How can this purely formal distinction change the nature of these processes, as if by magic?

But that is not all. This inversion has no existence for two of the three persons who transact business together. As a capitalist, I buy commodities from A and sell them again to B... [A&B] step forth only as buyers or sellers of commodities. I myself confront them each time as a mere owner of either money or commodities, as a buyer or a seller, and what is more, in both sets of transactions I confront A only as a buyer and B only as a seller. I confront the one only as money, the other only as commodities, but neither of them as capital or a capitalist, or a representative of anything more than money or commodities, or of anything which might produce any effect beyond that produced by money or commodities.(258)

Even in the relatively even playing field of the Mediterranean, this creates the ability of one party, the capitalist, to hold an overwhelming advantage of knowledge of (closer to) the entire process of exchange, instead of one part. In addition, this creates impetus to find new sources of valuable materials (a source of relative surplus value) spurring expansion. These twin impulses help drive and enable early European expansion. The next key to super-imperialism lies in the medieval monasteries.

Moving quickly (for more detail; Landes The Invention of Time and parts of Crosby The Measure of Reality), medieval monks became very fixated on routine, schedule, fixed times unchanged by the movement of the sun, etc. This made them efficient workers, and it spread into the cities. This conception of time (time composed of homogenous, discrete units instead of heterogenous, continous movement) is a necessary precondition for the existence of the capitalist mode of production, but here we are interested in its relationship to the construction of the modern escapement clock (as opposed to e.g. water clocks, sun-dials, etc).

Modern clocks (basically the kind where time is measured by discrete intervals of sounds; the tick) arise from this conception of time, as a way to create clocks that are more consistent. At first, a main goal of such clocks was to regulate monastery life better; it spread to cities and burghers from there. At this point, we are at the pendulum clocks, and these serve well for use on land. However, the clock has applications for navigation.

In sea navigation you wanna know how far North/South you are (latitude) and how far East/West (longitude). Latitude is much easier to find to an accurate degree than longitude, so it was a major limiting factor in naval navigation. The pendulum clock allowed for much more accurate longitudinal readings, but pendulums do not work at sea. Even more complicated, smaller, mechanical clocks were needed, and they were created. This allowed Europe to reinforce its naval navigation advantage regarding trade.

From 1492 and even earlier, the ships developed through mass trade in the mediterranean saw Europe become a global middleman, buying (or stealing) goods in places where they were common and selling them in places where they were rarer. This was ultimately the source of European wealth and power, as they enjoyed a collective near monopoly on (direct) intercontinental trade, flow of information and military movement.

Europe's dependence on those ships gave it impetus to develop more intricate clocks and ships, and the wealth flowing into Europe gave it the means. As Europe shifted more towards exporting manufactured goods, this created impetus for methods to rapidly produce tons of shit. As manufacture turned into industry (meaning; as the machine was invented and the human turned into a mere motive power and machine-minder), a more controllable motive power was needed, and coincidentally existed in large quantities in the centre of manufacture (Britain).

The information gap also makes resistance, or even intention to resist more difficult:

The circulation of commodities differs from the direct exchange of products not only in form, but in its essence. We have only to consider the course of events. The weaver has undoubtedly exchanged his linen for a Bible, his own commodity for someone else's. But this phenomenon is only true for him. The Biblepusher, who prefers a warming drink to cold sheets, had no intention of exchanging linen for his Bible; the weaver did not know that wheat had been exchanged for his linen. B's commodity replaces that of A, but A and B do not mutually exchange their commodities...We see here, on the one hand, how the exchange of commodities breaks through all the individual and local limitations of the direct exchange of products, and develops the metabolic process of human labour. On the other hand, there develops a whole network of social connections of natural origin, entirely beyond the control of the human agents. (208)

...

Since money does not reveal what has been transformed into it, everything, commodity or not, is convertible into money. Everything becomes saleable and purchaseable. Circulation becomes the great social retort into which everything is thrown, to come out again as the money crystal.(229)

Conditions of production (e.g. extraordinarily brutal slavery, unprecendented ecocide, etc) are similarly in "the hidden abode of production on whose threshold there hangs the notice 'No admittance except on business'"(279-80), so for example while someone might reject trading furs for alcohol if they knew the alcohol was made with horrific slave labour, the conditions of international trade kept most knowledge in European hands. Without being aware of the conditions of oppression, without lines of communication, without immediate knowledge of the Europeans' goals, etc, co-ordinated defence against Europe is difficult.

[-] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 72 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

irony poisoning, it's bad folks! Boomers got lead in their blood but by god zoomers have iron in their brain

edit: i do wanna point out that this isn't so much an issue of 'smartness' as "large groups generally fail to understand anything more subtle than a hammer to the head" thing (i.e. a critique of irony in mass consumer culture of which the internet is a part)

view more: next ›

ComradeRat

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 5 years ago