The GDPR includes exceptions for governmental surveillance.
Dort misshandelten sie ihr Opfer über Stunden. Traten auf das Mädchen ein, schlugen es mit einem Wasserrohr, rissen seine Kleider vom Leib. Stolz nahmen die Täterinnen, ebenfalls zwischen 13 und 15 Jahren, die Folter per Handykamera auf. Behörden reagierten erst nach massivem öffentlichen Druck
Die Misshandlung fand bereits am 22. Juli statt, doch handelten die alarmierten Behörden offenbar langsam und unmotiviert. Erst nach massivem öffentlichen Druck gaben sie eine Erklärung ab, wonach die Täterinnen mit milden Strafen davon kamen – zwei sollen angeblich auf eine Schule mit besonderen Erziehungsmaßnahmen versetzt werden, eine kam mit einer Belehrung davon.
Der Vater des Opfers, ein Analphabet, soll zudem von der Polizei gedrängt worden sein, eine Einigung zu unterzeichnen, die er nicht verstand.
Die Öffentlichkeit vermutete eine Zweiklassenjustiz. Denn die Eltern der Täterinnen, so hieß es in Gerüchten in den sozialen Medien, hätten gute Verbindungen zu den Autoritäten.
Mit Hunderten Sympathisanten zog die Familie des Opfers zur Stadtverwaltung, wo einige Personen das Gebäude stürmten. Die Polizei mobilisierte Sondereinheiten und mindestens ein Militärfahrzeug mit Störsender, um Internet und Mobilfunk zu blockieren.
Wie armselig muss man sein, dass man als Polizist Menschen verprügelt und festnimmt, damit ein paar Bratzen aus der Obrigkeit folgenlos Mädchen Foltern können, die auch deine eigene Tochter sein könnten.
Und was soll eine Gefährderansprache überhaupt bringen? - Es sind ja keine Terroristen, die Gewalttaten von langer Hand planen.
Ich glaube nicht, dass sich Terroristen von einer Gefährderansprache beeindrucken lassen. Gerade weil man die effektivste und beliebteste Terrorwaffe - ein KFZ - überall in Deutschland kaufen oder mieten kann.
Was eine Gefährderansprache dagegen mit Sicherheit bewirkt, ist es Verfolgungswahn zu steigern. Damit wird die Polizei eher zu Verschlechterung der Gesundheit der Betroffenen beitragen, was langfristig dazu beiträgt, dass sie in eine Ausnahmesituation kommen, wo eine Fremd- oder Eigengefährdung wahrscheinlicher wird.
So, if you set a bios password either way, which benefit does secureboot give?
When Israel "assasinates" a "high value target" usually dozens if not hundreds of people are murdered alongside. Heck they have an AI tool to make sure that targets are hit when they are home with their family to maximize the casualties.
If you are Palestinian, Israel will probably try to kill or abduct and torture you. So people rather die fighting.
Anybody else who finds the color choice counterintuitive? At first i was wondering, why all the ships are on land.
Pretty sure that there is a lot of military and "pirate" ships around the world that also have their transponders turned off regularly.
Possible catches based on past statements and decision. They don't have to materialize, but we need to be vigilant:
- The German government might just be lying. They don't have to report on decisions which weapons or other military equipment are exported to whom until much later.
- The German government might make distinctions between weapons and other military equipment and rebrand that equipment as for civilian purposes. i.e. spare parts for military vehicles, radio equipment, personal armor...
- The German government might satisfy itself with a declaration by Israel, where the material would be used and then not ensuring it isn't used in Gaza. We saw the same last year in September when arms exports worth a hundred million Euro were authorized after Israel sign a waiver that they promise not to use them in war-crimes.
- The German government might have coordinated with the US to ensure the gap is filled, or organized circumvention by selling through a third country.
- The German government might have coordinated with Israel that this is only temporary and in return will use this as a fig leave to continue blocking economic and diplomatic efforts to pressure Israel.
The decision by the government is not binding like a law. There is no immediate repercussions for breaking it. The only repercussions are outcry by the people and media and down the line hopefully prosecution in The Hague.
Why would he try?
The Democrats banked on the idea that Trump is the easiest candidate to win against, despite Clinton loosing to him in 2016. And it was clear with Biden. He wasn't voted because people liked him. He was voted because people were dissatisfied with Trumps first term. And Biden managed to fuck up so badly, that people rather chose Trump for a second round than to deal with Biden or Harris, who stated explicitly that she will do everything like Biden.
The Democrats thought that Trump is perfect as he lets them get away with being the worst version of themselves and they'd rather see another Trump presidency than actually provide good policies for the people.
Contrary to the Israeli claims there is no evidence of Hamas stealing food.
The video Israel published of the last moments of Yahya Sinwar showed him fighting on the front lines and until the last moment. Releasing that was very stupid from a propaganda perspective as Israel itself proved its claims about Hamas leaders hiding in tunnels and being well fed to be lies.
The Nazis said similar things when "liquidating" the Warsaw Ghetto after the Jewish resistance mounted an uprising.
Israel also murdered some of their own civilians as they were dragged back to Gaza, employing the "Hannibal doctrine" that previously was only used to murder their own soldiers to prevent them being taken POW.