Man this question would sink me because of the misnomer that HTML is a programming language.

Australia has lots of venomous animals but with an astronomically low mortality rate these days. IIRC the 10 most venomous snakes in the world can all be found in Australia

We don't have any large predators that would actively hunt people, worst case is you'd be messed up by a wombat, kangaroo or boar if you were an idiot towards them.

Luckily for Google, its predictive AIs were clairvoyant on this one and it has been running at 110% evil so any cuts to evilness do not impact peak evil performance.

I'm the jerk? Hahaha, you are defending a nazi.

Yeah this administration has no blood on its hands whatsoever.

Again, fuck off.

Oh yeah I remember that part of the Nuremberg where they just acquitted all the crimes against humanity for the people with ASD.

He's a nazi, fuck off.

Programming is a balance of compromises, one has to define a balance between optimisation, maintainability, legibility, security and much more.

The kernel handles a bunch of different 'low level' things that are quite complicated (Allocating memory to programs, scheduling what programs the CPU needs to run, creating security layers for users, handling temperature and performance throttling, peripherals etc)

Due to its pivotal role in an operating system, the kernel developers walk a very thin line of compromises to ensure that it can be maintained and still remain performant.

They do all of this while ensuring that any updates to the Kernel do not break older systems when they update (fingers crossed) or they do not break programs specific to the user (Userspace programs)

Friendly reminder that the IPCC models have consistently been conservative in their approach, mainly because the reports are influenced by policymakers and a biased committee before they reach daylight.

You can look this up yourself, there is plenty of criticism from the scientific community.

IIRC the AR6 said it had high confidence that we would not reach 1.5c before 2030 and medium confidence we would reach it around 2035.

Because of this I want to say that the 1.5c limit is an arbitrary bullshit number for policymakers to appear as though they're aiming for a goal.

There is no safe level of warming, and a large amount of these feedback loops have and may happen because of factors other than ONE fucking number. (E.g Human influence on the Amazon)

A similar point to be made, we tried this style of legislation in Australia.

Under the guise this was for the publics interest, the only 'legal' vapes you can buy in the country now are manufactured by Phillip Morris International and other big tobacco companies.

The blackmarket continues to thrive and with it organised crime grows, have yet to see a pharmacy that stocks 'legal' vapes.

Police in my local area are either paid off or get black market tobacco products for free to turn a blind eye to this issue, can't imagine thats limited to my area only.

I'm all for regulation around nicotine products but I sure as shit wouldn't trust a pollie to make decent legislation around it at this point in time.

Oh suck it up you soft cock Nazi wannabe, can't have this ketamine addled fuckwit harping on about empathy being a weakness and at the same time ask people to be polite to him for being a shitstain on humanity

parries your article

Lmao get rekt