656
submitted 2 years ago by captainred@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 671 points 2 years ago

The important piece of this to me is this: She made $1 mil on OnlyFans and $42k/year as a teacher. She wants to be a teacher despite making plenty of money from other sources. This tells me that unless you have other evidence of impropriety she's someone we want in the classroom. It also reinforces my stance, along with plenty of other studies that have been performed, that a universal basic income won't stop people from working.

Pay people better and we'll just keep working because we like it. It's part of being human, but we shouldn't be suffering to survive at the same time.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 187 points 2 years ago

$1 million = 23.8 years of teaching at $42K/yr.

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 78 points 2 years ago

Add in that id you don't blow it all, you get to count the interest income. A long term investment gets about 6-7% per year. That's actually more than the teaching job pay.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

To go the other way, her tax bracket is a lot higher than the base salary alone would be. And if it's $1m in a year, almost all of that will be in the highest bracket.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If shes single, her combined effective federal and Missouri income tax is around 40%, so she took home roughly 600k. If she's married, then her total effective tax is 25%, so she took home 750k.

For the 600k investment at a conservative 4%, which right now you can get in some savings accounts, her interest alone would be 24k/yr. For the 750k, it would be 30k/yr.

With a more realistic return of 7-8% in today's high interest rate markets, both of those sums would net more than her old salary of 42k/yr.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

A long term investment gets about 6-7% per year.

Much better than that in the current market

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 28 points 2 years ago

Brb selling pictures of my balloon knot.

In all seriousness though, I don't blame her one bit

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago

You'll forgetting rule one

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 35 points 2 years ago

People probably will choose to work on different things though. It's harder to exploit a workforce that isn't as desperate. That's the real reason why UBI isn't happening.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 years ago

I quit a job I really liked for one I didn't like nearly as much because I hardly made more than minimum wage

If I won the lottery I would go back to that first job and work for free.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

What job would anyone do for free, apart from unpaid sex work?

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Working with animals

[-] Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social 17 points 2 years ago

Ditto. Ive met countless older people now who kept up doing the work they were passionate about, even if it in time became a hobby that they did at a loss. People like to work. They like to see the fruits of their labor take shape before their eyes, and they like feeling like theyre doing something that benefits someone other than themselves.

As it stands, the rules we live by only reward the infinite pursuit of profit, but that doesnt align with the values people find themselves holding whether they like it or not.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

Case in point to your last part:

I was fired at the beginning of the year. I had sufficient funds I coulda retired if I wanted to. I’m not quite 40.

It’s been 2 months and I am so fucking bored I got a job. I didn’t go get a part time job to fill my time, I got a job in my field continuing to work at “my level” because it fulfills me.

I’m now able to do what I want because I want to rather than because of some existential need. My work product is WAY better.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

a universal basic income won't stop people from working

A bit offtopic, but I came to the same conclusion during a somewhat philosophical discussion with a friend who expressed skepticism with the increased automation aspect of the world, and we extrapolated this into a hypothetical world where almost everything was automated.

His concern was that one day humanity could find themselves dependent on an automated system over which they had no control.

My response, being a bit of a techno-optimist, was that:

  1. We kind of already do
  2. Someone has to keep this system running
  3. Even if I was paid an UBI, I would still like to be part of #2.

I'm the kind of guy who makes the little gears spin so that the cog can turn, and I derive entertainment from reviving broken complex systems, and I wouldn't want it any other way

[-] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

There are valid criticisms to UBI (usually specific to each implementation), but "lazy workers" will never be one of them.

[-] Baylahoo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I completely agree. I tinker and change my PC to parts because it's fun. Did it make a difference to performance? Kinda. Was the effort put forth because of performance alone? No. People like making Legos and just put them on a shelf. There are consumer products where the customer is paying to do the work themselves for little gain above the fun of the journey. Why wouldn't it expand to many other areas? And if there's not enough people willing to do something, make it worth their while to fix it, but that's already a problem and UBI isn't the big smoking gun people claim it to be.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We ARE dependent on systems over which we have no control, since a LONG time, the hell are you on about? One cog in this machinery busts, and you die, and you won't be able to do a thing about it.

Edit: jesus I was drunk when I wrote this shit, sorry

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I can see a problem with kids in her school starting to see her as a sex worker rather than a teacher.

load more comments (27 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
656 points (97.1% liked)

News

36018 readers
2129 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS