John Barnett had worked for Boeing for 32 years, until his retirement in 2017.

In the days before his death, he had been giving evidence in a whistleblower lawsuit against the company.

Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett's passing. The Charleston County coroner confirmed his death to the BBC on Monday.

It said the 62-year-old had died from a "self-inflicted" wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 346 points 2 years ago (46 children)

He was staying at a hotel out-of-state while giving evidence against Boeing.
He was found dead in his car in the hotel parking lot from a 'self-inflicted wound'.

There's really no other way to look at it logically than he was murdered by Boeing. Nothing else adds up.

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 191 points 2 years ago (22 children)

    He wasn't even done giving the deposition that he literally volunteered to give...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [+] -264 points 2 years ago (21 children)
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You could've just done so and moved on, my guy. It's not a profound statement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I upvoted this.

    Why?

    Let me list the reasons: it’s creative, provocative and a little sultry.

    I’m about half hard right now so you deserve it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [+] -19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You can have an upvote too!

    I’m floppier then a rubber tube full of jelly but that’s because I’m in my refractory period.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Did he not literally volunteer?

    I mean, I get it, I'm sick of "literally" meaning "figuratively", and I'd die on that hill with you, but this is the dumbest possible time to make that stand. In this case "literally" just means "literally".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    Literally has been used as an intensifier for over 200 years. The Oxford English Dictionary includes a definition of literally meaning "figuratively". Jane Austen, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Henry David Thoreau, James Fenimore Cooper, James Joyce, Charles Dickens, and Mark Twain all used it that way in their writing.

    So until you write something as well respected and enduring as Sanditon, The Great Gatsby, Tom Sawyer, or Ulysses and collect your mother fucking Nobel prize in literature, please choke on a literal dick you confidently incorrect fuckwit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't care what justification you throw out. Misuse of literally drives me figuratively insane!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 85 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I mean, I think the logical thing to do is wait until the evidence comes out and we know for sure. It's entirely possible he was under a lot of stress from all this and did kill himself. Now, I don't deny that it's a HUGE. FUCKING. CONICIDENCE. but those do happen from time to time. Its also a hell of a story, good-guy whistleblower murdered by greedy multinational aerospace company and defense contractor...during an election year...if you wrote the script nobody would buy it.

    Let's be suspicious, but not jump to conclusions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Jesus, do you think maybe they're trying to run out the clock too? Who wants to bet that a certain CEO is angling for a political position within a certain potential administration? Perhaps head of the FAA?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    An investor could’ve threatened his family? (So not directly Boeing)

    If he got a bunch of hate online, or had crippling anxiety about the testimony he still had to give? I mean you could even speculate he thought he would be killed someday, so he took it into his own hands.

    (Please note the above is all BS!)

    I would argue the jury is still out and that we may never know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Direct involvement might be a question still. But general involvement is absolute. If Boeing wasn't so shitty he almost assuredly would still be alive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    An investor could’ve threatened his family? (So not directly Boeing)

    Or somebody involved in corporate corruption and embezzling in Boeing. That would be worse for Boeing as a whole than him remaining alive, but possibly better for that somebody who may not be identified.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    They don't gain much. The FAA is breathing down their neck already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The FAA has allowed this mess to continue for far too long because Boeing is an industry titan. Too big to fail. Well, maybe not anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Too big to fail is a terrible concept that was invented.

    If a company gets too big to the point that it's failure is going to drag down the company. That company should be broken up to allow them to to fail. Anything else is either reward the company for making bad decisions or allow companies to become stagnant because if anything happens, the government will bail them out.

    Edit: Spelling and grammar are important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    What do you mean? They fail all the time. Fail to secure doors. Fail to have working oxygen masks. Fail to warn pilots about a system that points the nose of the plane down constantly…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago

    It makes no sense for them to kill him, that draws wayyyy too much attention. More likely if they were involved, they blackmailed him and that caused him to kill himself, or another party that also wanted to keep him quiet killed him and they didn't care if it looked like Boeing did it.

  • source
  • parent