this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
1273 points (93.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5863 readers
4516 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Recognition isn't as important as you make it sound. And most people will hardly start to work out of boredom. There's plenty of ways to spend your time that are not productive.

In addition, there are plenty of jobs literally nobody wants to do, and consequently, nobody would do under your proposed system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

With absence of money as the main 'power' it's your deeds that are the only thing left to define the extra exclusive things like apartments, experiences, etc.

And that is the thing, afaik all studies & experiments concluded that people start being productive regardless. It's not "out of boredom". Its just something to do. Sure, not everything benefits everyone, but imagine the impact of all the eg artist stuck flipping burgers. They would seem 'unproductive' just "laying about" until they produce a pice the whole world recognizes as something special (and not just because of the marketing budget).

Basically no one just stays still doing nothing, definitely not a significant margin. Same with animals, at the very least they will play.

Eg, could you imagine your life without long-term producing/making/planning something?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I absolutely could. Why not?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not even thinking? Reading books? Talking to people?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

None of these activities produce anything

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't they? Imagine people thinking a bit more, having free time, etc - the effects on politics, local quality of living, and so on.

I would much rather live in a neighborhood of people reading books all day vs working in a factory all day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Reading books doesn't build houses

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nope. Building houses builds houses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My point exactly. I could quite easily imagine my life without ever building a house. And so could everyone else. So your argument doesn't really work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't really see how you can speak for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What are you even trying to say here? Are you trying to make a point of any sort or just being obnoxious?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think we both made our points and that we disagreed. No need to be obnoxious about it, you can just stop replying if you don't enjoy the convo.

But yes, if I didn't have to go to work to buy food, I would help build stuff, work on various interesting projects that would have me, etc. Absolutely no way I would stand still adding nothing to no one.

Its what universal basic income is proving, people are still productive, but how they went to be & what they like doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's a bit different though. UBI means people can survive without working, but working will still drastically increase their quality of living.

And sure, you may still work if you had no benefit from it, but would you put in as much time as people do now? And how many other people would?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, I would probably work even more, but only the things I wound enjoy, putting my time into things I expect the most (non-monetary) reward/experience/sense of pride/whatever floats my goat.

And the 'put in as much time part, I suppose it would vary very much, some would still be workoholics, some would would with an hour a day but be more productive bcs that's just how they do their best. An all of that is ok imho, in a post scarcity world where everyone can be housed & fed for a fraction of the total global prediction, the whole point is to work less ... The 'work' part in sense of must, with less options overall.

Im really saying, that I would like that ppl would be able to 'do' ("work") what they like, be productive in their way (or not at all). I'm one of those ppl happy to pay taxes, regardless of (or especially for) social transfers.