this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
344 points (98.3% liked)

News

23267 readers
2982 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Overall, the analysis, released as a pre-print, found that RTO mandates did not improve a firm's financial metrics, but they did decrease employee satisfaction.

Drilling down, the data indicated that RTO mandates were linked to firms with male CEOs who had greater power in the company. Here, power is measured as the CEO’s total compensation divided by the average total compensation paid to the four highest-paid executives in the firm.

This is an interesting metric. And the research outcome makes a lot of sense.

Also, RTO policies are garbage - but I'm stating the obvious.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Even stupider (to me anyway) was the hybrid schedule I was put on at my last job. You could work from home 16 out of 40 hours every week. Why not 20/20? No fucking idea. However, you could take those hours literally however you wanted.

So, like, I'd come in after lunch and another person would already be gone.

Because of that, all of our communication was via Slack and all of our meetings were via Zoom.

What was the point? I mean I appreciated being able to work from home at least part of the time, but if you're going to let us do it part of the time whenever we want, what's the point of having us in the office ever?

On top of this, it was an office inside a large manufacturing facility, meaning that if they had just had us all do WFH, they could have added two to three more production lines.

The whole thing was fucking stupid and it just made us resentful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only thing I can think of to explain this shit is that it’s not about us, it’s gotta be about the value of the building you work in

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They owned the building and it was not kept up or in great shape, so I don't know if that was the issue. I really didn't understand it at all. They would have been able to be more efficient if we weren't there not because the office staff would be more efficient but because they could pump out more product, faster.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Yeah but if nobody works in offices anymore, the value of those properties will drop significantly. Lots if business have big money tied in their properties, they don’t want to lose that money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why not 20/20? No fucking idea. However, you could take those hours literally however you wanted.

So, like, I’d come in after lunch and another person would already be gone.

The reason is staring you right in the face: to guarantee you have overlap in the office.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago