this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
248 points (89.7% liked)

Games

32343 readers
948 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Okay let me start with two heavy hitters right from the get go and don't forget these are only personal oppinions and I absolute understand if you like those games. Good for you!

Zelda: Breath of the Wild - Not a bad game per se, but I don't get the hype behind it. Sure the dungeons are fun but the world is so lifeless, the story non existent, the combat pretty shallow, the tower climbing is very much like FarCry but for some reasons it's okay here while Ubisoft gets the blame...like I said I dont get why the game is so beloved. Never finished it after the 20 hour mark and probably never will.

Red Dead Redemption 2 - Just like Zelda not a bad game, but imho highly overrated. Graphics and and atmosphere are amazing but the controls are clunky and overloaded, nearly everybody is an unlikable douchebag who I would love to shoot myself at the first opportunity (maybe except Jack and Abigail) but I have to root and care for them. The game is just so long and feels very stretched, you already know that you won't get Dutch because it's a prequel and for an open world game you often get handholded in your weapon selection or things you can do because you have to wait for them to be unlocked by the game. I'm now nearly done with the game, playing the epilogue at the moment and I would say the last chapters are more entertaining than the rest of the game, but I still can't understand why this game was on so many game of the year lists and I really wanted to put the controller down a dozen times.

So there they are, two highly controversial oppinions by me and now I'm really curios what your takes are and how highly I get downvoted into oblivion πŸ˜‚

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Doom Eternal. I don’t usually enjoy FPS games and I’m not very good at them but I absolutely loved Doom (2016) as it took out most of the things I hate about FPS games. But in Eternal I just felt like I was constantly out of ammo, and there was too much focus on using specific weapons against specific weak points on enemies which I couldn’t get the hang of

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I quite enjoy Doom Eternal, but it's true it's a very different game from Doom (2016). You either vibe with the combat flow the game enforces or you don't. There is exactly one way to play it, by rotating between all the abilities as they go off their cooldowns, so you can keep restoring your ammo, HP and armor respectively.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I agree, when I first picked it up I couldn't get into the rhythm of the game and hated it, but once it clicked it was a lot of fun. You can't really go in expecting to play exactly like Doom (2016).

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah I also couldn't get the hang on Doom Eternal. Loved the first one but the second one cramped so many unnecessary elements into it and made it too complicated. The first one was a simple but highly effective shooter, but the second one was just bloated with stuff nobody asked for.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, Doom 2016 is easily one of my favorite singleplayer fps games. Doom Eternal is just worse in every way, and I couldn't get through more than a few hours.

It completely breaks the combat flow state that made the original great

Instead of having the freedom to prioritize enemies and weapons, it wants you to do things a very specific way

Instead of the minimal but interesting story from the 2016, we get a convoluted mess, with random characters that we have no reason to care about.

Also, despite 2016 looking quite good, they decided to make Eternal garish and cartoony for some reason??

I could go on, but anyway I hope we get a proper 2016 sequel some day.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm replaying Doom Eternal right now and I feel this so hard. Even with ammo upgrades and judicious chainsaw use I'm constantly out of ammo. Really makes me wish for a melee weapon that doesn't have limited fuel or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

This is a few days old but I might be able to help. Are you switching weapons or just sticking to a single one?

A single chainsaw gives you something like 20 shotgun slugs and a bunch of ammo for every single other weapon, you shouldn't have ammo problems unless you are trying to kill a heavy demon with the assault rifle primary fire.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

A complete downgrade from Doom 2016 in every way. Combat was complete madness, there's no such thing as planning ahead. You can only endlessly dash away while insta-swapping weapons ad infinitum.

Doom 2016 made you think. Is this glory kill to risky? Is the gap wide enough to make it through, who do I have to kill first? Doom Eternal reduced that to a single repetitive four button loop.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Have you considered using your chainsaw to "rip and tear"? It can help you with the ammo issue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I didn't even like Doom (2016). It was ugly, dull and I hated the finisher system. Really disappointed because I'm old enough to have played the other Doom games as a kid and I mostly enjoyed the new wave of boomer shooters. Great soundtrack though.