News

23268 readers

2933 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

605

‘It’s embarrassing’: Republicans worry they have no achievements to run on in 2024 (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, has openly questioned whether the GOP deserves to keep the House majority, lamenting the lack of accomplishments this Congress. He’s not alone.

When Congress began the new year, Rep. Andy Biggs gave a television interview and made a startling confession: House Republicans have done nothing they can run on.

“We have nothing. In my opinion, we have nothing to go out there and campaign on,” the Arizona Republican said on the conservative network Newsmax. “It’s embarrassing.”

Anchor Chris Salcedo responded with a bemused chuckle. “I know,” he said. “The Republican Party in the Congress majority has zero accomplishments.”

The exchange captured a dynamic that looms over Republican lawmakers heading into the 2024 election: They’ve passed little substantive legislation since winning the majority in 2022 and struggled to do the basics of governing with a Democratic-led Senate. Their first year was instead marked by fractiousness and chaos, complicating the party’s pitch to voters this fall. The challenge is accentuated by likely GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump making “retribution” against his enemies, rather than shared policy goals, the centerpiece of his comeback bid as he continues to spread fabricated claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)

            
              Managed to delay starting work for weeks due to Speaker votes impasse
Held numerous hearings investigating Biden's son and the origins of COVID-19, resulting in no substantial findings
Ensured that an $858 billion defense spending bill passed, but it was mostly a continuation of previous policies
Brought forth a bill proposing cutting federal food stamp benefits by approximately $13 billion over ten years
Passed a resolution condemning Antifa and Critical Race Theory, without any legislative actions following through
Held multiple congressional meetings on the dangers of TikTok and Big Tech while doing little about them
Introduced and passed a bill prohibiting federal funding for gender-affirming care for transgender minors, which President Biden ultimately vetoed
Pushed for a national sales tax to replace income taxes but failed to gain support
Proposed a bill to ban earmarks but later reversed their decision after facing backlash from within the party
Made headlines with a proposal to cut off federal funds for schools teaching "divisive concepts," but the bill died in committee.


            
          

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

On the talks with the social media companies didn't they make sure government couldn't interfere? They delayed the promotion of the military officers over abortion

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So there's actually two things there that sound good to me, that I immediately doubt because if Republicans were in favor of it I have to assume there's something horrible about it...

What's bad about a national sales tax, and banning earmarks? Those kinda sound like good things to me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Sales taxes disproportionately impact the poor.

First, any tax that's a fixed percentage will be a higher percentage of a person's income even that income is lower.

Secondly, there's a point in "wealth generation" where you don't spend everything you make. Money that you save isn't taxed by a sales tax -- so, again, the less money you make, the more it impacts you.

Regarding "earmarks" it really depends on what it's for. As a blanket statement, "Earmarks Are Bad" is just a small government taking point -- which itself can be understood as an anti-poor dog whistle, since conservatives call support for society's most vulnerable "wasteful spending" -- but you can often hear "earmarks" in reference to defense spending, which is typically a Democrat talking point.

I think that "earmarks" is actually a really interesting word, since, in a practical sense, it never means anything -- or, more accurately, it always means nothing specific but I'm a vaguely specific way. The word doesn't refer to a specific spend, but it refers to a specific kind of spend -- so it sounds much more specific than it actually is.

If a politician refers to a specific earmark, they run the risk of alienating whoever benefits from it; by being exceptionally vague, they can associate their brand with fiscal responsibility without actually doing anything fiscally responsible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'm just curious what a world with sales taxes instead of income tax would look like. I'm sure that the poor, and the retired, would be disproportionately impacted. But income taxes are impacting most of us, right up the ass, all the time. And what a waste of time, energy all the tax filing nonsense is. That's not fair, either, and I want to be freed from it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I didn't express good OR bad. I just listed some of the things that were done.