33
How does your favourite game ease the GM job ? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/rpg@ttrpg.network
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I keep reading over various internets communities, how being a GM is hard, how player are ungrateful spoiled kids, and how much GM struggles.

So which games have tools/mechanics to ease the GM job, and which are these.

For this discussion I would focus on the game itself, rather than on method used by groups.

Even though I feel like I know some answers, judging how active the community is at the moment, I try to open that thread and may-be a few others to keep the /c/ alive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think there are three main ways to make it work:

  1. Giving the GM tools to do the job. I remember reading PF2e and thinking, wow, it fills in so many of the gaps I had to improvise on the fly as a DM, and the balancing systems seems to, you know, work. Kevin Crawford's work, especially the ...Without Number series, famously provides so many useful tables guidelines even if you don't use the underlying system itself. Then there are system-neutral resources like the Tome of Adventure Design.

  2. Providing clear explanations for how and why the system works the way it does. I know it's a love-it-or-hate-it system, but Burning Wheel is great for this. It's a weird system, and whatever you think of Luke Crane, it's useful to have guidance and explanations for why the rules are the way that they are. Plus the Codex adds even more. I found I really like GM resources that explain the thought process behind running the game. IIRC some of Ben Milton's work does the same, and I like to have a commentary for my own projects.

  3. Giving the players meta-narrative agency. Admittedly, this one is extremely subjective. I have mixed feelings about it. I'm absolutely happy to let my players make some decisions for the game, but I found that my group specifically prefers to inhabit a world rather than shape it, and I'm not crazy about that style of play in practice. It feels more like writing a story than playing it out. TO BE EXTRA CLEAR, this is a matter of personal preference. For those who like it, it works fantastic, and the popularity of that kind of game goes to show how it works for a lot of people.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    For 3- I still think about a post I made a while ago where I mentioned giving players more creative input as a means of increasing engagement. The example I gave was when the players returned to the magic academy the wizard had graduated from, I asked the wizard player what the lighting situation was in the grand hall. Like if they had lots of mundane candles, or a big chandelier, or magic lights, or what. He was pretty into it.

    One person in the thread responded that they would hate that. They want to be told a story and explore a world! Asking them to make out-of-character decisions like that just ruins the whole experience for them.

    Completely alien to me. I always look at these as like writing a story, and I'm never "being" my character.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Different strokes, of course. :)

    I think for me and my group, it's just a sometimes thing. I think I'd be happy to let players make some decisions about the world around them, but narrative control of action resolution just fell a bit flat.

    It's also why I like the distinction between "writing a story" and "being a character." It indicates the difference without presenting either as better than the other, which is a risk when talking about... well, anything, especially online. :P

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent