this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
765 points (99.6% liked)

RetroGaming

19544 readers
191 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/41704

[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In theory, a way for an artist to independently sustain continuous output of creations.

[–] HobbitFoot 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how so? The only way it potentially makes sense is a Disney Vault like idea, but even then that only provides additional value for very old works that could be argued should be part of the public domain.

I can't think of a case where an artist would ban publication of their own work made within the last 20 years to make money, but please let me know of a potential case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Artificial scarcity and charge high for the trickle of legal distributed works and content.

[–] HobbitFoot 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm asking for an example of an artistic work made in the past 20 years where that happens, where a work is pulled for an extended period of time.

What does the market currently do?