this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

news

23537 readers
422 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Worth noting that the Chinese ambassador also called it the Malvinas throughout, not the Falklands.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On the one hand, anything that makes england-cool mad is cool and funny, but why pick literally the only place they settled fair and square?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

how is it fair and square they literally fought a war over it, to prevent argentina from getting to use it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Argintina literally had a US installed fascist government that was torturing people for being socialists at the time of the Falklands war. Losing the Falklands war was one of the main things that led to the collapse of said government

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what justifiable claim does Argentina have to the islands?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That it's literally a foreign government's outpost on an island directly off the coast of Argentina, which Argentina could benefit from (and Argentina isn't as rich as Britain).

What claim do a bunch of British people who get their British people food shipped half way around the world have? They don't even import food from Argentina as far as I know.

Apparently they even has a ship they sail around there. Woo hoo massively polluting military industrial complex!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

100% agree, the US’s claim to Cuba is valid and it should be a US territory.

That’s how we handle islands off the coast right? Significantly closer than the Falklands, and the US actually owned Cuba for a while!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, how dare the Irish occupiers squat on the western british isles, intruding into the UK's rightful atlantic EEZ. The people that live there will be returned to rightful british rule, as that is clearly what is harmonious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's been a british outpost since before argentina was even a country
it's just a spanish imperial claim inherited by a colony, pursued by the colonizers

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It literally has nothing to do with that. It's land off the coast of Argentina. They should be allowed to use it and not have British oil drilling and navy ships patrolling around it.

How long before the US decides to coup Argentina and sets up some spy base or black site on the islands, if they don't have one already?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (39 children)

How long before the US decides to coup Argentina and sets up some spy base or black site on the islands, if they don't have one already?

and how would that be affected by the brits owning it?

as a communsist, the thing i care about the most is people and the people of the falklands overwhelmingly want to be part of this hell hole for some fucking reason
and given that the islands were uninhabited before they were colonised, there is no justification for suddnly making them argentinian

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

There's a lot to criticize the UK for. Fairly inhabiting barren rocks without an indigenous population isn't one of them.

load more comments (6 replies)