this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
235 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22219 readers
85 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to [email protected].

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or [email protected].

[email protected] is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

1."Federal agencies have the authority to intervene in protests, picket signs, or blockades. The law is impartial: it must be enforced without exception."

2."Federal forces are not required to have judicial oversight for their actions."

3."Forces are not obligated to consider alternative entrances or pathways. If the main path is blocked, their duty is to clear it."

4."This action continues until the flow of traffic is fully restored."

5."To carry out these acts, forces will use the minimum necessary force, which is sufficient and proportional to the situation they are addressing."

6."Instigators and organizers of the protest will be identified."

7."Vehicles used in the protest will be identified and subjected to citations or penalties."

8."Data of the instigators, accomplices, participants, and organizers will be transmitted to the authorities through appropriate channels."

9."Notices will be sent to the judge in cases of damage, such as burning flags."

10."In cases involving minors, relevant authorities will be notified, and the guardians of these youths who bring them to these demonstrations will face sanctions and punishment."

11."The costs incurred by security operations will be borne by the responsible organizations or individuals. In cases involving foreigners with provisional residency, information will be forwarded to the National Directorate of Immigration."

12."A registry will be created for organizations that participate in these types of actions."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, my inbox has grown +35 today, and these are only those I've been too lazy to answer, so yeah, my attitude is not friendly.

Especially since the whole thing started with mentioning that I'm kinda libertarian as a source for a statement about libertarians, and not challenging something I wasn't interested in challenging.

And if it helps, you are right, if they'd be at least as willing to test and doubt their ideology as, say, ansyns often are, it'd be in a better condition.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And if it helps, you are right, if they’d be at least as willing to test and doubt their ideology

We are doing that constantly, you are trying to shake parts which already have been set in stone for quite a while and as such this is why you aren't treated very seriously. You lack knowledge in aspects many of us already posses and are trying to school us on them, this is backwards. If you'd like to shake these foundations you'd need to find some kind of really strong drill.

Well, my inbox has grown +35 today, and these are only those I’ve been too lazy to answer, so yeah, my attitude is not friendly.

Eh understandable, but you don't have to even respond to everyone or continue the cycle of being perpetually mad. You've got no else to blame getting into this predicament but yourself.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

"The only thing the Soviets did wrong is give Ayn Rand an education" - I don't remember.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, that's different. Just a habit of reacting at events. I'm not mad, just bored to death and irritated by that.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not mad

-A guy who is definitely mad

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Mad in the sense of "being crazy" maybe, but not in the sense of "being very angry".

Just a habit of reacting at events.

I meant that.

Also the more anxiety some other occupation causes, the more I retreat to shit throwing contests here.

That's my reason. What's yours?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's my reason. What's yours?

I'm hungover and it's fun to shit on you

I meant that.

So your habit is to get mad and cry about it? Lmao that's sad

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And if it helps, you are right, if they'd be at least as willing to test and doubt their ideology as, say, ansyns often are, it'd be in a better condition.

buddy, people here are constantly investigating their own ideology and beliefs. You're just not saying anything that warrants introspection, because you're not saying anything novel or of value.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think I've managed to slip in a few between answering shit thrown at me with shit thrown back. But it's in your own interest to search for such things, not in mine.

I also think that this

because you’re not saying anything novel or of value

doesn't gain weight because you type it. Only for people respecting you in some way, but for me you are a bunch of letters on a website.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think I've managed to slip in a few between answering shit thrown at me with shit thrown back

Oh no, I'm so sorry to hear that people have been mean to you! Do you need someone to kiss your boo boos? If you need a time-out it's completely fine.

Only for people respecting you in some way, but for me you are a bunch of letters on a website.

For a guy who doesn't care, you sure do care a lot about how people treat you.
You've now gone from "oh yeah I totally wouldn't have been a shithead if people had been nicer" to "whatever, I'm just a shithead because you don't matter to me and I don't even care!" So which is it? Do you not care, or does it hurt your feelings that people treat you like the dumbfuck that you are?