this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
545 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

5506 readers
2040 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think.... they should start with ... paying the wages that got stiffed- with some steep interest. Then, the company gets fined to oblivion... and the individuals responsible for it go to jail.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The cost of the crime also needs to include the probability of getting caught for any business to consider the crime more than an overhead. For example, if the probability of getting caught and having to backpay + fine is only 5%, the backpay + fine needs to be at least 20x greater in cost than if they'd not committed the crime (5% x 20 = 100%), because they are likely to get away with the crime 19 out of 20 times. That's only to equalize the financial* consequences. Then you need to multiply again to add significant financial damage.

When you realize the above, the absolute pittance of most fines is even more enraging.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

yeah. Every time I hear about the SEC or somebody levying fines... you look at what they made in profits and it's basically just a solicitation of a bribe. for financial crimes, the start needs to be surrendering all profit associated with said financial crime. then a fine that hurts.

for wage theft specifically, it's usually happening to people who can't afford to be stolen from, so I'm okay with a nuclear option.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I'd be all for a really high interest rate, plus a fee based on the size of the company.