this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
394 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37801 readers
227 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Seems unlikely that a creator would jump ship from a platform that pays them to a platform that doesn’t. That being said, lots of creators also constantly complain about demonetization, so maybe they’ll start to get fed up and move to purely in-video sponsorship things. Seems most likely from a creator that’s already on a platform like nebula

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most big youtubers have in-video ads now anyways. I'm not sure what the ratio of their revenue comes from youtube ads vs in-video ads, but youtube seems pretty trigger happy about demonetizing videos. Sometimes entire channels. If someone gets the majority of their revenue from other sources than youtube ads, I could see them migrating to something like peertube.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even with in-video ads, those must be paid based on historical (or actual?) view counts right? No matter how big you are, there's no way you're going to maintain view counts when switching away from YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're allowed to upload the same .mp4 file to multiple websites. There's absolutely no reason why a creator that isn't getting YouTube ad money couldn't upload to YouTube and PeerTube at the same time. Presumably if they're getting YouTube monetization, they have some kind of exclusivity agreement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

you're definitely right on most points. but, to your point, if a creator was on a federated instance of peertube then they don't have to worry about the wishy-washy, everchanging rules of youtube :3

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sponsorships are even worse than ads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not for the creators (as far as I know. I am not a content creator so this is just from creators talking about it)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I could see someone making some fork of peertube that helps creators get paid. May not be free but could get creators willing to join

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

if it's not free what's the benefit of using PeerTube? You're basically describing nebula