this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
251 points (94.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6672 readers
790 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Yeah, C4 is not exactly a ranged weapon unless it’s paired with an impact detonator and flung via trebuchet.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Then we just strap naquadah on the C4 and blow the whole continent up. There you have your range.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Yeah, C4 is not exactly a ranged weapon"

Not with that attitude it isn't.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Its like he's never even kissed semtex

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t Jedi throw them all the time? Like doing spinning out boomerang moves or is that just the games?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah it happens, but the bright light from the blade makes it clearly visible meaning that in a real battle your enemy would see where you are and kill you before your boomerang would come back to you

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're returning blaster bolts.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A Jedi vs. a random Tau'ri with a P90 would hardly be a fair match. The Jedi wouldn't know what hit him.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Slugthrowers are a viable weapon against jedi, old canon at least.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've had Star Wars fans argue vigorously that a Jedi could deflect a cloud of buckshot with a lightsabre. I'm a Star Wars fan myself but that's a sure sign of someone who's gone completely off the deep end. It's a very basic question of simple geometry - you can't intercept every pellet in a three-dimensional cloud with a two-dimensional rod regardless of how fast your precognitive reflexes are.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I’d sooner accept stopping all the pellets using the force, like Neo did in the second Matrix movie.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's not even two dimensional, it's one dimensional!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Ah, brain fart, indeed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Claymores certainly have range.