this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8193 readers
640 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Saw a TikTok about some woman asking why men have to disturb the peace of a Saturday or Sunday morning by mowing their lawn or using a leaf blower, and you would’ve thought she went on a bigoted rant by the comment section. Like damn she was just talking about how it would be nice to enjoy a peaceful morning and random commenters took it as a personal attack. Shit you not I truly believe some suburbanites would go to war over their lawn the way they treat it like a fortress to a castle.

Is this not extremely silly when you type it all out? Time is a circle and I feel like I’m a peasant under feudalism watching kings, nobles and knights protect their land like it’s under some type of threat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People have a right to exist and make noise in their own homes

Framing things in terms of rights and not outcomes is a silly exercise in personal incredulity.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I disagree I think rights are a meaningful framework for discussing behaviour. People can have a right to for example disablity access even if it's annoying and more costly to the group

it's also relevant here because when it comes down to it this argument boils down to who has a right to command. The other side of this argument is intrinsically tied to the concept of right to peace and quiet

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guy this just sounds like centrism with extra steps

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

how is that centrism I am saying that there are conflicting rights here and if one interest is allowed to dominate the other then it results in a deeply unpleasant living situation.