this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8193 readers
640 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Framing things in terms of rights and not outcomes is a silly exercise in personal incredulity.
I disagree I think rights are a meaningful framework for discussing behaviour. People can have a right to for example disablity access even if it's annoying and more costly to the group
it's also relevant here because when it comes down to it this argument boils down to who has a right to command. The other side of this argument is intrinsically tied to the concept of right to peace and quiet
My guy this just sounds like centrism with extra steps
how is that centrism I am saying that there are conflicting rights here and if one interest is allowed to dominate the other then it results in a deeply unpleasant living situation.