1608
Pythagorean Theorem Found On Clay Tablet 1,000 Years Older Than Pythagoras
(www.iflscience.com)
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
1608 points (99.0% liked)
News
23397 readers
3650 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nice. A repost from two days ago from a repost from 5 years ago. This us old news.
It is almost 4000 years old, but this is the first time I have seen it.
One of today's lucky 10,000! 🎉
Please list all news facts now, so there will be no reposts.
If you miss one, delete your account for misinformation.
It's the only way
I searched in my app for Pythagoras and I didn't see it posted. I wouldn't have posted it if I had known it had been posted two days ago. In the grand scheme of things it isn't that horrible a transgression.
I don't blame you. Here's the one from 2 days ago. (New to lemmy. I'm guessing there's a better way to link posts, but I don't know it.)
As you can see, the only way you'd be likely to find it is if you searched for "trigonometry" or "babylonian". That's why it's so important to have the most specific keywords in the post, for searching. "Babylonian" and "trigonometry" are really good for this, but it feels like "Pythagoras" or "Pythagorean" is essential.
I actually remember seeing that article but I didn't click on it. Oh well. I really want lemmy to survive. I used to love Google+ and it was sad to see it die a slow death. For a while it was, in my opinion, the best photography community on the web. I figure if people see the same content over as over again they'll just leave. So I'm trying to post frequently but not just pure crap.
The paper this article is based on is from 2009. I'd argue that's against rule 5.