This week's topic is quite programming heavy, sorry to all non programmers doggirl-gloom

https://xkcd.com/312/

yap

LISP stands for LISt Processing and was invented by John McCarthy, who was looking computation with symbols and recursive functions in the 1960s.

John McCarthy was the son of immigrant Communists (members of the CPUSA), but after witnessing the failed counter-revolution in Prague in 1968, he himself became a Republican lenin-dont-laugh.

A Lisp program consist of a few basic building blocks:

  • Symbols - basically text without whitespace, for example: +, hello123, if, nil, etc.
  • Numbers, Strings, etc.
  • Cons cells - a Pair, denoted as (cons 1 2) or dotted (1 . 2)
  • Lists - a linked list of Cons cells with the final element being the symbol nil.
    • (list 1 2 3) is the same as (1 . (2 . (3 . nil))).

As you may have noticed, cons and list are inside the parentheses, thats because a function call like f(x,y) is written instead as (f x y). This is called a Symbolic expression and all Lisp code looks like this.

(+ 1 (* 2 3) 4)
;; multiply 2 times 3 => (+ 1 6 4)
;; add 1 6 and 4      => 11

;; the names 'car' and 'cdr' are ancient relics from some assembly instructions
;; basically first and second element of a cons cell
;; or head and tail of a list
(car (cons 1 2)) ;; => 1
(cdr (cons 1 2)) ;; => 2

This in turn means that any code can be turned into a list, so that it can be modified like data. I think thats quite neat and unique among programming languages (it even has a fancy word: this property is called homoiconicity).

Functions that operate on code are called macros.

;; generate a function 'name' that adds 'value' to the input
(defmacro defun-adder (name value) 
  (list 'defun name (list 'x) (list '+ 'x value)))
 
(defun-adder plus5 5)
;; define the function plus5(x) as x + 5 
;; => (defun plus5 (x) (+ x 5)))

(plus5 10) ;; => 15

To make sure the interpreter does not try to evaluate a symbol, it needs to be "quoted". Since this comes up quite often, it gets the shortcut of ' at the beginning.

Theyre much nicer to work with than for example macros in C:

#define PI 3.14159265

this C macro just searches and replaces the string PI in the C source code before compilation and theres lots of ways to mess up, for example

#define DOUBLE(x) x + x

if x is a function call that does something else, like printing, then that message will appear twice. Operator prescedence is also not considered: DOUBLE(1) * 3 will expand to 1 + 1 * 3, so 4 not 6 like one would expect.

The last thing I want to yap about is Lisp1 vs Lisp2. This refers to the amount of namespaces any programming language has. if functions and variables are allowed have same names, then there needs to be a namespace for each.

for example in CL:

(defvar x 1)
(defun x () (+ 1 1))

x   ;; variable      => 1
(x) ;; function call => 2

is perfectly fine, while in other languages like Python or C or Scheme this wouldnt work.

Shoutout to respected comrades lilypad and sodium_nitride who are also true Lisp patriots.


___ Join our public Matrix server! https://rentry.co/tracha#tracha-rooms ___

As a reminder, please do not discuss current struggle sessions in the mega. We want this to be a little oasis for all of us and the best way to do that is not to feed into existing conflict on the site. Also, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It's for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.

Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.

spoiler

Common Lisp Logo, an alien holding a flag with the word LISP on it
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 17 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I took a few pictures of myself today and enjoyed it.

It..... It was fun!

(Joyful giggling.)

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)
  • [โ€“] 8 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    In hindsight me looking at myself in photos and videos and then feeling weird about it is making more sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    100-com It's so wild how obvious stuff like this can feel once you realize it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    The thing that threw me for a loop was that when it came to mirrors I was only uncomfortable that one time.

    But yeah looking back the photos/videos thing was dysphoria. No wonder I didn't like seeing myself in them!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    spoilerThat's really interesting, I wonder if it's sort of your brain trying to protect you in the moment or something? Still, I guess the less dysphoria the better. It's super awesome that you've found a way to take pictures you do like also!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    My pet theory is that it's a signal processing thing in the subconscious and just being used to how I look.

    Looking at oneself in the mirror is a real-time thing. All things considered you're not really thinking all that much While using the mirror, the "boilerplate" in your subconscious is doing most of the heavy lifting. (Although of course the "higher" portions of the brain are still chiming in.)

    While recognizing oneself in photos is quite abstract oriented.

    Oh! There was this one day where I was shirtless in front of my sibling and the urge to get up, put a shirt on, and then come back hit me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment