100
"My main issue with Marxism is that it isnt idealist"
(thelemmy.club)
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Isn't the whole point of the social contract that once you break it, you fall outside of it? So if your rights come from the social contract, they can be taken away?
There are differing views on the true purpose of the social contract, but the argument he is presenting is that we have natural rights, i.e. rights that precede any human construction or even really humans themselves, and the function of a social contract is to create a social framework (particularly laws, including legal rights, i.e. rights constructed by humans for governance) that allows us to make sure our natural rights are observed.
You are right about social contract frameworks normally being based on unpersoning, which brings into question how seriously the social contractors are really taking those supposedly-transcendent natural rights, but I think the more fundamental issue really is what the commenter in the OOP says, which is that natural rights are literally just totally made up and fictitious.