303

Anna's Blog: AI companies destroy physical books — let’s scan rare books before it’s too late (annas-archive.gd)

submitted 19 hours ago by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TL;DR: AI companies are secretly buying, scanning, and destroying millions of physical books to train their models, permanently locking human knowledge inside private corporate servers. Anna’s Archive is urgently calling on volunteers worldwide to scan and upload books before this cultural heritage disappears forever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

The thing the headlines keep skipping over in pursuit of outrage-clicks is that this is how you scan books in bulk. The spine is removed and the pages are fed through a high-speed scanner in sequence.

Any particular reason why can't you just rebind the book after? Even if it is with a different binding.

(And no, I don't mean I'll take "capitalism" for an answer)

[-] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 4 points 4 hours ago

There's no use, those books barely have any cultural value. They're unsold inventory, why would you pay to rebind them ? Nobody wants to buy them anyway.

Books (as in the physical object itself) are not rare or particularly precious they're among the most mass produced objects in the modern world.

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

This reminds me of a book I read recently. I get like 30 $1 paperbacks at the library used book sale every spring / fall. When I'm done reading them they go on the unit book cart for the patients unless theyre wildly objectionable (and it takes a lot for me, I recently put out some only mildly tasteful furry badger shapeshifter smut).

Anyway this year I got something called "the king's hounds" where the back summary sounded lit but it turned out to be super rapey (like Sean Connery bond just keep doing it until they shut up rapey). And it's been sitting on my coffee table collecting dust since I finished it because it feels wrong to just throw it away but I'm definitely not giving it to my patients (who like, ALL have rape PTSD for some reason). I probably will wind up throwing it out but. Fuck. It just feels wrong to destroy a book for some reason even though that's probably the only thing to do.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 11 hours ago

I can imagine a couple of reasons.

The most straightforward one actually is "capitalism", but maybe if I explain it a bit you'll accept it? :) I expect that the vast majority of the books that these companies are scanning are bought in bulk from wholesalers at the cheapest possible price, since the goal is quantity over quality. That means they're probably buying the leftover books that the wholesalers are just one short step away from sending off to be recycled into pulp anyway. So re-binding them would mean they're still left with nearly-worthless books that nobody else wanted to buy. It's like those book sales libraries have from time to time, they put out the books that are scheduled for "disposal" in hopes that somebody will pick up a few before they go into the dumpster.

The other reason depends on the physical nature of the book. There's lots of different book binding techniques and not all of them will leave you with something that's easy to put back together. Lots of books are made up of smaller subunits of pages called "signatures", typically 8, 16, or 32 pages, that get stitched together into the finished product. There are coil-bound books, comb-bound books, all sorts of things like that. A lot of them probably wouldn't leave pages that are amenable to a one-size-fits-all rebinding. So that makes things a lot more costly, and again that's a cost that produces a book that's probably worthless for resale anyway.

Honestly I suspect that getting chopped and scanned is the best case scenario for most of the books in this situation. It converts them to digital form, rescuing their contents from being lost. The thing that bugs me is just how these companies squirrel away their hoards of books from the public. And the blame for that lies largely on copyright law, so I can't blame them too much.

[-] raman_klogius@ani.social 3 points 8 hours ago

Ah, the poetic irony of scanning physical slop to train digital slop.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026

303 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70047 readers

545 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.