93
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml to c/chat@hexbear.net

I have to keep reminding myself that China's drug policy has its origin in historical trauma and the opinions of its people reflects that. They really think weed is like heroin or something it's tragic.

Gonna go smoke some weed about it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Majestic@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Liberalism? From a left tradition of revolution-less western failures who openly admit spending time attacking and arguing and west-splaining with citizens of AES nations online instead of engaging in something useful like organizing or even arguing with their own liberals. And over their precious drug treats and the right to fund CIA slush funds and affiliated extreme reactionaries via the purchasing of such. All within the context and perspective of deeply alienated, atomized late stage capitalist rot and cope that drives them to such substances. Even as their own imperial core spirals into the violence turning inward the desire to lecture is too strong for the westerner.

A little humility goes a long way. Maybe next time just don’t try to undermine the party and national unity over something so ridiculous. Just bite your tongue and remember you are the guest.

[-] dead@hexbear.net 28 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

west-splaining with citizens of AES nations

China's anti-cannabis policies originated from the west. United States invented anti-cannabis laws to discriminate against migrant workers from Mexico. The term "marijuana" was popularized by the US because it sounds Spanish. Most countries made cannabis illegal just because of United States influence.

In 1970, the United States completely revamped its existing drug control laws by enacting the Controlled Substances Act (amended in 1978 by the Psychotropic Substances Act, which allows the U.S. drug control Schedules to be updated as needed to comply with the Convention). In 1971, the United Kingdom passed the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. A host of other nations followed suit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Psychotropic_Substances

In 1970, US passed the Controlled Substances Act under the Nixon administration, as part of the Nixon's "War on Drugs". In 1971, United Nations signed the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, influenced by the United States. This treaty is what influenced most countries to make Cannabis illegal.

The Convention of Pyschotropic Substances was signed in February of 1971, when PRC was not a member state of the United Nations. At the time, the UN considered Taiwan (ROC) to be the representative of China. PRC joined the UN in October of 1971. In 1972, PRC told the UN that it was not obligated to follow treaties signed by the ROC.

PRC joined the Convention of Psychotopic Substances in 1985. Marijuana/Cannabis became illegal in China in 1985 due to western influence.

edit /// changed the wording of the taiwan situation, due to possible misinterpretation. Chinese Taipei is still a part of China, under the One-China Policy. From 1945 to 1971, UN recognized the ROC as the representative of China and did not recognize PRC. After 1971, UN recognizes PRC as the sole representative and does not recognize Taiwan/ROC as a country.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You seem to imagine my comment or two exchange with a couple Chiness folks as much more serious than it was. It wasn't a lecture and I was quite literally asked

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 28 points 16 hours ago

A little humility goes a long way. Maybe next time just don’t try to undermine the party and national unity over something so ridiculous. Just bite your tongue and remember you are the guest.

@lemmy.ml account posting on bear site after not reading the OP

[-] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 19 points 16 hours ago

Lmao didn't catch that "you are the guest" part that is some sweet irony.

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 33 points 17 hours ago

This is a ridiculous reaction to someone saying they disagree with a community and explained that they still understood their reasoning.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
93 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8637 readers
239 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS