37
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14416 readers
573 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
i clearly don't know what the hell argument you're relitigating here, that thread wasn't even linked, dude.
i'm relating OP to general grains that are very common in 9/11 truther shit, not all of them are about limbs and explosions: jet fuel and steel beams, aircraft impressions in buildings after crashes, the characteristics of asbestos, etc. etc. etc.
9/11 trutherism is infested by knowitall dingbats that don't have the first clue how things "should" look declaring it was staged based on vibes. i don't rightly know that applies to you, but you didn't make a good first impression.
the user above is directly quoting my comment from another thread
that stuff is just minor window dressing anyway, the core truth that Mossad and CIA were heavily involved and knew of it beforehand and helped plan it, helped train and fund the organizations responsible, participated in a cover-up to hide these connections & then took advantage of the spectacle and terror to invade unrelated parties is indisputable. They had the Patriot Act and Iraq War already drafted up and ready, and the second 9/11 happened they hit go.
certainly, my point is i find it worrisome when people emphasize and focus a lot on the mechanics of the operation, because it usually introduces wrong ideas.
the politics are both mostly unfalsifiable and introduce doubt around state power so i don't think it's very offensive. my opinion is that it's not a very effective grain to focus on in 2026 but it's whatever if that's how you want to convince people the CIA is bad