1249
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It's nothing more than surface level though. Their "knowledge" is limited to whatever is present in their training data, and any claims it makes outside of that are manufactured based on statistics and it's knowledge of word order, not actual understanding of actual facts.

Just because it gets it right sometimes doesn't mean it knows it's right. Because, again, the only thing LLMs actually understand is word order.

[-] dreamless_day@feddit.org -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No it’s not limited to their current training data. Like I said, they can search the internet, get information from websites or available studies, summarize and use that in their answers.

Just because it gets it right sometimes doesn’t mean it knows it’s right.

Again, how do you know?

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

how do you know?

Because I've studied LLMs and the underlying concepts they're based on.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
1249 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7738 readers
2263 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS