172
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
172 points (99.4% liked)
World News
2293 readers
750 users here now
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
Rules
Be excellent to each other
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
hopefully he makes it through illegal nazi detainment
Hopefully you stop making it look as if shitlibs are right about horseshoe theory by sucking Putin's fascist cock
Can we cool it with the homophobic language. Blowjobs aren't inherently a bad thing and we shouldn't push the idea that giving them means you're subservient. There's other ways to abuse these pieces of shit
It's about feeling the need to give pleasure to the asshole. I don't care if you're gay. That's fine. I care if the people you want to please are murderous authoritarian dictators. If you think that's homophobic, then that's implying you think being gay makes you love dictators, which would be an odd belief to hold.
If you want to suck a morally upstanding person's cock, that's a good thing.
If you want to suck an evil person's cock, that's a bad thing.
It isn't the cocksucking that's at issue.
It is 100 percent the cocksucking that is the issue. Which is exactly why I am bringing this up.
Insult people without using one of the most common homophobic insults. This is not up for discussion.
I like that you think you can just dictate something and say it's not up for discussion while it is literally being discussed, and there are valid responses. No, you don't get to decide this. You are not the arbiter of language, and you don't get to decide what other people perceive. It's fine to ask nicely, but not in the manner you're doing. You can say "I think [x], so please stop" but that's not what you're doing. You're trying to tell us what is meant.
While we're at it, aren't asshole, pussy, dick, and just about every other insult not allowed too? Are we just not allowed to speak, because language has old connotations built into it? Are you going to start telling people that gendered romantic languages are wrong? What about something like gentlemen, which originally meant someone from a good family?
No, trying to fix language like this is pretty ridiculous. They didn't say anything homophobic. Just because you read something into it doesn't mean everyone else has to change. I think most people wouldn't think the comment above is saying the person is bad because they're subservient. It's clear that it's bad because of the person they're trying to please.
I’m not going to spend my time arguing with a lib about this. I suggest you go interact with more queer communities and get their view on this.
I’ve explained that such language is not welcome here and if I see it again I will remove it.
Interpreting the mere mention of fellatio in a criticism as inherently homophobic is a YOU problem.
It's not homophobic to accuse someone whose gender you don't know of providing sexual pleasure to awful people as an insult.
For the record, I'm very much pro-blowjob between consenting adults of any gender identity and sexual preference, but equally against fascists receiving pleasure of any kind.
You are using blowjobs to denigrate a person and contributing to a long history of homophobia in regard to hierarchical roles of people who give oral or receive anal as subservient lesser people.
It is 100% homophobic to use sucking dick as an insult, there is no positive connotation behind your comment. You were not using male oral sex as a positive statement, the goal was to shame someone for it.
Only in the sense of giving pleasure to someone who deserves none AKA caping for a dictator.
I already explained this, so please put away your preconceived notions that expressions can only be interpreted in the way you say they should.
Only in the case of people like yourself who can't divorce meaning from metaphor.
Nope. Stop repeating your false preconception and READ my explanation from before ffs!
Again, giving pleasure or advantage to those who don't deserve it is a negative thing. Context matters.
No, the goal was clearly to shame someone for glorifying the war crimes of a fascist dictator.
I already explained that I don't consider oral sex between consenting adults in any way shameful regardless of whether you're receiving or giving.
Read the original comment and my clarification again. The intention and context is 100% free from homophobia, just like I wouldn't be shaming sartorial choices if I had chosen the milder "caping for Putin".
That is impossible because they cant stop themselves from doing that.
When Russia projects