223
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starblursd@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

You already have to prove ID with your ID. Requiring that you get an additional voter ID, which of course you'll have to pay for just puts an additional hurdle to exercise your constitutional right

[-] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Nope. The 24th amendment effectively bans poll taxes. A requirement to pay for an ID would become a poll tax. States would need to shoulder the burden of issuing gratis IDs.

[-] starblursd@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Because this administration cares so much about the Constitution and definitely wouldn't find some sort of loophole to get around it

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

In the US this is only true in some states but not in others.

The bigger principle is that running elections is one of the real "states' rights," and the federal government doesn't really have any business telling them what to do.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nope! When I vote I roll up to the polling place, wait in line, the volunteer asks my name, finds me on the list, and hands me my ballot. No ID needed, no picture on the list or anything, just "trust me bro."

If I wanted to vote for my non-voting friends literally nothing could stop me, they'd have to review camera footage later ~~once~~ if a friend found out I voted for them, and yes then I'd go to jail, but you'd have to catch me.

"Voter ID" in US debates typically just means "showing your state ID to vote," not "getting a separate ID just for voting." I've actually never heard anyone advocate for a secondary ID (I'm sure some exist, but it's uncommon).

The issue is supposedly black people disproportionately "can't get IDs easily." Although that said, literally every black person I have ever met over the age of 18 has had one and they actively consider it racist for people to assume they can't get one. And that's not just "my black friend," it's a lot of people over a long time, I'm in a very mixed area.

But here's the big kicker for me: if needing an ID to vote is racist because black people can't get IDs, then needing an ID is racist full stop. If it's about specifically needing an ID to use one's "enumerated rights" specifically, and not say tobacco etc, that still means it's racist to require ID for alcohol (21st amendment) and guns (2nd amendment).

Not that I'm "for" voter ID, I just disagree with it being "racist" like is often touted, I could much more easily see "transphobic" applying however depending on how it would handle name changes and the like.

[-] GlacialTurtle@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

Rather why dont you tell me why America is the only civilized (and use that term lightly) nation that considers it suppression to prove ones identity before filling out a ballot to vote?

Why do people like yourself lie so frequently and so easily?

I'm not from the US and have voted without ever having to "prove" my identity.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
223 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9370 readers
294 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS