146
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
146 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
43276 readers
238 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Also Moonshot, Alibaba, Baidu. Can they also be reined in?
It doesn't matter who invented DRM. My point is that DRM fundamentally doesn't work. If you pubish a web page in a manner that allows humans to read it then it's also readable by AIs. A pinkie-promise not to is the best you can get.
That's like saying copyright doesn't work. If a human can see it a human can copy it
This post is about Google, so that's why I'm focusing on Google. This is a positive step forward against one massive, unethical, evil AI company.
Defeatism just benefits them. We don't need it.
It's not defeatism btw, it's opposition to the idea that people should have a say if their content is used to train an LLM.
Eh, it's less about defeatism and more that I'm watching a fight between two assholes so I'm finding it hard to empathize with either side.
Like... Publishers regularly screwed over consumers, content creators, and tried to break the web multiple times. They can bleed for all I care
Guess we'll see, then. I suspect the result is going to be a bunch of websites going "huh? Where did all our traffic suddenly disappear to?"
Google's zero-click AI search is already harming small publishers! I'm glad we have some common ground on opposing that.
Pushing for regulation against providing AI results would be a great start, which would make the step in this article unnecessary.
Trying to legislate the world to go back to the way it was in 2023 probably isn't going to work any better than DRM does.
You can, in fact, legislate to enact a better status quo. America has a history of civil rights laws that demonstrate as much.
You don't have to "legislate the world" to make some positive change.
Ah, one of those believe in the system guys. The US history on civil rights is one of horror and oppression.
While I agree with your points and sentiment, the US civil rights laws (including the Civil Rights Act) are being continuously torn apart by billionaires and religious lunatics, so maybe not the best example.
Regardless, there are plenty of examples of laws succeeding in bettering the status quo going even as far back as Babylon.