157

For decades, publishers have done everything in their power, from the legal to the not-explicitly illegal, to rank as highly in Google Search as possible. For many websites, traffic from the search engine was their single greatest source of audience and, as a result, revenue.

Now though, a handful of influential players in the digital media ecosystem have begun moving in the opposite direction, laying the groundwork for what was once unthinkable: removing themselves from Google Search.

Beginning Sept. 15, all new websites signing up for Cloudflare, as well as all the customers on its free tier, will have the default settings in their bot management protocol set to block “multi-purpose crawlers” on any webpage that has ads. This means that any crawler that scrapes for both search indexing and AI training will be turned away at the door, unless the site owner decides otherwise.

“We’ve been clear about what we want,” said Cloudflare chief strategy officer Stephanie Cohen. “We want a technical solution that allows you to be discoverable without having to give your content away for free.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] XLE@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago

The companies doing the unethical scraping are the megatech companies: Google, OpenAI, Anthropic. They can absolutely be reigned in.

Megacorps invented DRM to try to keep their profits from the public. Now megacorps are trying to scrape up everybody else's data and close off the public. That's literally the goal of Google's zero-click AI.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 1 day ago

Also Moonshot, Alibaba, Baidu. Can they also be reined in?

It doesn't matter who invented DRM. My point is that DRM fundamentally doesn't work. If you pubish a web page in a manner that allows humans to read it then it's also readable by AIs. A pinkie-promise not to is the best you can get.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

This post is about Google, so that's why I'm focusing on Google. This is a positive step forward against one massive, unethical, evil AI company.

Defeatism just benefits them. We don't need it.

[-] minfapper@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

Eh, it's less about defeatism and more that I'm watching a fight between two assholes so I'm finding it hard to empathize with either side.

Like... Publishers regularly screwed over consumers, content creators, and tried to break the web multiple times. They can bleed for all I care

[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Defeatism just benefits them. We don’t need it.

It's not defeatism btw, it's opposition to the idea that people should have a say if their content is used to train an LLM.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 1 day ago

Guess we'll see, then. I suspect the result is going to be a bunch of websites going "huh? Where did all our traffic suddenly disappear to?"

[-] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Google's zero-click AI search is already harming small publishers! I'm glad we have some common ground on opposing that.

Pushing for regulation against providing AI results would be a great start, which would make the step in this article unnecessary.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 1 day ago

Trying to legislate the world to go back to the way it was in 2023 probably isn't going to work any better than DRM does.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

You can, in fact, legislate to enact a better status quo. America has a history of civil rights laws that demonstrate as much.

You don't have to "legislate the world" to make some positive change.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

While I agree with your points and sentiment, the US civil rights laws (including the Civil Rights Act) are being continuously torn apart by billionaires and religious lunatics, so maybe not the best example.

Regardless, there are plenty of examples of laws succeeding in bettering the status quo going even as far back as Babylon.

[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah, one of those believe in the system guys. The US history on civil rights is one of horror and oppression.

[-] InevitableList@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

That's like saying copyright doesn't work. If a human can see it a human can copy it

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
157 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43282 readers
214 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS