281
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago

Fuck misogynistic twerps and assholes who give flight attendants and other kinds of service workers a hard time, but this story would not be getting signal boosted by rags like the Daily Mail and New York Post if it wasn't a Muslim immigrant being accused

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Misogynistic religions should be cancelled for their misogyny.

Fuck them, fuck the misogynistic dress code, and fuck this asshole for assuming his backwards fucking religion applies to free and more enlightened countries like Germany. They can either adapt their religion to 21st century ideals, or earn all of the criticism they rightfully deserve.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 42 points 22 hours ago

"I prefer that men who assault flight attendents not be muslim" -news outlets owned by rich christians who believe 99% of what sharia law muslims believe

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 8 points 23 hours ago

There aren't many non Muslims who would try to use Sharia law..

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Most Muslims don't have anything to do with the extreme version pushed by the Salafis.

[-] Wren@lemmy.today 21 points 22 hours ago

They use use regular laws and systemic oppression in the white, western world. There was a time in the white western world where only good looking, single women could be flight attendants. There was a time in the white, western world, that my grandmother remembers, where she wasn't allowed to have a credit card without a husband or father to co-sign.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago
[-] Wren@lemmy.today 5 points 20 hours ago

Oh hey, it's the guy who was banned from the women's com.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago

Was I? I literally cant keep track anymore lol

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Meanwhile, in the middle east, even good looking, single white women still have to cover up everything from head to toe in 120°F weather.

I'll pick the law set that at least acknowledges its faults and isn't 2000 years behind the times.

[-] Wren@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Where do you live that the legal process isn't corrupt and biased? Besides, it isn't a matter of choosing between bad and worse. The only reason any system has progressed is through recognizing the faults and pushing, sometimes violently, for change.

This is especially important because, as we've seen in the U.S, we can lose rights much more easily than gaining them.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Where do you live that the legal process isn’t corrupt and biased?

It's not black and white. It's a gradient.

You seem to be arguing that the Muslim-controlled countries are somehow the same as the western world, because where Muslim countries would fallback to religious dictatorships and Sharia law enforcement, the western world replaces that with "regular laws and systemic oppression".

I'm arguing that the sort of worldview lacks a metric fuckton of nuance. Muslim-controlled countries are still centuries behind the times of free and democratic countries, in terms of social moralities and minority acceptance.

[-] Wren@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, that's not my argument.

I'm arguing that brown countries are over stigmatized as backwards when it comes to women's rights, when white countries aren't as progressive as people would like to believe, and we still have a long way to go.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

If by "brown countries", you mean Islamic Sharia law countries, then they are, by definition, backwards when it comes to women's rights. Afghani women's rights groups were just starting to claw back modern social norms before Trump fucked it up and gave the country back to the backwater assholes that we call the Taliban.

We should stop accepting their beliefs as just some harmless extension of their religion, and call it out for the oppressive bullshit it is.

[-] j_overgrens@feddit.nl 1 points 6 hours ago

Why the f would it be worse if they're good looking?

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I was just mirroring the previous poster's comments.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
281 points (91.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21978 readers
1051 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS