90
submitted 4 days ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soup@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately, he keeps siding with the US and against the Canadian working class.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

His stances are confusing. He seems to be opposed and pissing Trump off at times but kissing his ass the next. Carney is a hard right banker and still has the sign up that he says we must acknowledge was always a lie.

His support for the Iran war could be that he genuinely believes it, as Iran is opposed to western hegemony and thus is a threat to western banks (that he has devoted his life to), but just so much other shit like the privacy and civil rights erosion bills that also work hand in hand with US corporations and authorities make me wonder if his opposition to annexation is sincere or he is just hoping it is a purely Trump thing and when the old orange bastard finally dies his successors will want business as usual (all bowing to the false sign idol he condemned at Davos) and they can continue dismantling everything for the top 0.1%, with a bone tossed to the remaining middle class that will no longer be more than 10% and keep the rest a permanent underclass.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

His support for the Iran war could be that he genuinely believes it

I suspect there's a bit more nuance involved.

Most people would agree that the Iranian regieme is/was bad for both their own citizens and for the region.

But at the same time, what the Israelis and Americans did by starting a war with Iran is also a bad thing for the citizens of Iran and the region (and the rest of the world). Even if it did disrupt that immoral Iranian regime.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

The regime is bad for it's own people but for the region it was always israel backed by the west especially the usa

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I will repost what I wrote above:

First of all, Iran is not now, nor has it ever been, interested in acquiring nuclear weapons. I am not talking about some pie-in-the-sky hippie talk on some stoned out guy who doesn’t know what year it is, but this is based on the intelligence reports of the CIA and without question probably MI6, CSIS, the French DGSE and others. There is no nuclear weapons program.

They are still holding onto the claim that they want no nuclear weapons even if at this point in time it might actually make sense for them to actually WANT nukes, given the sheer bullshit the US and Israel is doing now they might actually have a fully logical justification for wanting it. Not because they want to nuke Europe or establish some global Shia caliphate, but simply as a way of holding up the same gun being held against them.

Prior to the 1979 revolution, Israel and Iran were actually allies. The main reason was due to the anti-Arabism and opposition to Arab nationalism of the Shah’s regime that acted as a major thorn in their neighbor’s sides. After the revolution this changed for obvious reasons. For a while Saddam was ‘our man in the Middle East’ due to the Iran-Iraq war (which I do not believe was instigated by the CIA. Saddam did that on his own feeling he can acquire more territory due to the rapidly changing and weakened position Iran had at the time), but Israel also always hated Iraq from the get-go and has been doing to them what they wish they could have been doing to the Iranians from day one. Constantly committing terrorism and bombing against Iraq when they had even the slightest interest in their own nuclear energy program (they bombed them in the 60s or 70s and killed some French nuclear scientists).

The main thing they have wanted with Iran now is the same thing they wanted from day 1 in 1979. They want to turn Iran into a failed state. They want internal chaos, people killing each other over nothing, and unable to organize in any shape or form. This is what they have done to Iraq post-first Gulf War (1990s Iraq was a shithole) and post-2003 Iraq War (which effectively turned the place into a quagmire from which it might not recover from for multiple lifetimes).

Second of all, yes… it is a shades of grey situation. But it isn’t what you think. I do not now, nor have I ever, supported the authoritarian religious rulers of Iran, anymore than I would have supported the authoritarian secular ruler of Iran pre-1979. Both were brutal in very similar ways.

But one thing I do not understand is how anyone, whether they are some random middle aged lemmiverse user like myself, or a leader of a large and fairly important country like Canada, could possibly think that ANY of this is a good idea for the reasons they think. The only fucking reason Iran is being attacked like this is because Netenyahu has the US by the balls (and his hands aren’t fully off yet) and he’s forcing this action because he has an aging absolute moron who is readily and easily bribeable in power, and the people he appointed are braindead ideologically driven religious fanatics and racials supremacists who would rather see the whole world burn in nuclear hellfire (or human-induced hellfire) than see a single non-white people not behave like Stepin Fetchit.

Does Carney really think that by doing what they’re doing now they’re going to actually liberate Iran? I am not a political scientist, but I have been watching political news for my entire adult life (even going before I was an adult) and one thing I learned is this: No matter how shitty a regime is to its people, the INSTANT they are under foreign attack, people will rally to the flag and behind the same shitty leader that had his army shoot at them barely days before. It happened with Saddam, it happened in Vietnam before it, it happened in Nazi Germany during WW2 (the post-WW2 guilty didn’t start until a new generation grew up after the war and it only got started in the 1960s and 70s. Prior to that the average German really didn’t know about Auschwitz and the majority opinion was denail of the holocaust).

I am not immune to it either. I fucking hated Trudeau for his lackluster reaction to the housing crisis that is effecting me every single day, and his gun laws that are both expensive and ineffective… but at the same when Trump started talking about Annexing Canada and Trudeau said ‘not a snowball’s chance in hell of Canada becoming the 51st state’ I couldn’t help but be supportive of him.

Carney’s support for the war is not based on humanitarian grounds or the belief that the religious regime should be overthrown because it will result in better lives for the average Iranian. Carney does not give one singular DAMN about the average Canadian at home. I will say it again. He is 100% interested in protecting the economic, military, and political hegemony of western banks over everything else. He will send the entire Iranian population to hell if it meant saving a single dollar for the banks.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago

The world isn't as simple as good guys vs. bad guys. It's all shades of grey, and your ally on one issue might be your adversary on another issue.

His support for the Iran war could be that he genuinely believes it, as Iran is opposed to western hegemony and thus is a threat to western banks

He's said why from the very beginning. Iran having nuclear weapons would be bad for everyone. He's suggested people read the IAEA reports on Iran. Have you? There's no need to speculate on what his intentions are, you just need to do some reading.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

First of all, Iran is not now, nor has it ever been, interested in acquiring nuclear weapons. I am not talking about some pie-in-the-sky hippie talk on some stoned out guy who doesn't know what year it is, but this is based on the intelligence reports of the CIA and without question probably MI6, CSIS, the French DGSE and others. There is no nuclear weapons program.

They are still holding onto the claim that they want no nuclear weapons even if at this point in time it might actually make sense for them to actually WANT nukes, given the sheer bullshit the US and Israel is doing now they might actually have a fully logical justification for wanting it. Not because they want to nuke Europe or establish some global Shia caliphate, but simply as a way of holding up the same gun being held against them.

Prior to the 1979 revolution, Israel and Iran were actually allies. The main reason was due to the anti-Arabism and opposition to Arab nationalism of the Shah's regime that acted as a major thorn in their neighbor's sides. After the revolution this changed for obvious reasons. For a while Saddam was 'our man in the Middle East' due to the Iran-Iraq war (which I do not believe was instigated by the CIA. Saddam did that on his own feeling he can acquire more territory due to the rapidly changing and weakened position Iran had at the time), but Israel also always hated Iraq from the get-go and has been doing to them what they wish they could have been doing to the Iranians from day one. Constantly committing terrorism and bombing against Iraq when they had even the slightest interest in their own nuclear energy program (they bombed them in the 60s or 70s and killed some French nuclear scientists).

The main thing they have wanted with Iran now is the same thing they wanted from day 1 in 1979. They want to turn Iran into a failed state. They want internal chaos, people killing each other over nothing, and unable to organize in any shape or form. This is what they have done to Iraq post-first Gulf War (1990s Iraq was a shithole) and post-2003 Iraq War (which effectively turned the place into a quagmire from which it might not recover from for multiple lifetimes).

Second of all, yes... it is a shades of grey situation. But it isn't what you think. I do not now, nor have I ever, supported the authoritarian religious rulers of Iran, anymore than I would have supported the authoritarian secular ruler of Iran pre-1979. Both were brutal in very similar ways.

But one thing I do not understand is how anyone, whether they are some random middle aged lemmiverse user like myself, or a leader of a large and fairly important country like Canada, could possibly think that ANY of this is a good idea for the reasons they think. The only fucking reason Iran is being attacked like this is because Netenyahu has the US by the balls (and his hands aren't fully off yet) and he's forcing this action because he has an aging absolute moron who is readily and easily bribeable in power, and the people he appointed are braindead ideologically driven religious fanatics and racials supremacists who would rather see the whole world burn in nuclear hellfire (or human-induced hellfire) than see a single non-white people not behave like Stepin Fetchit.

Does Carney really think that by doing what they're doing now they're going to actually liberate Iran? I am not a political scientist, but I have been watching political news for my entire adult life (even going before I was an adult) and one thing I learned is this: No matter how shitty a regime is to its people, the INSTANT they are under foreign attack, people will rally to the flag and behind the same shitty leader that had his army shoot at them barely days before. It happened with Saddam, it happened in Vietnam before it, it happened in Nazi Germany during WW2 (the post-WW2 guilty didn't start until a new generation grew up after the war and it only got started in the 1960s and 70s. Prior to that the average German really didn't know about Auschwitz and the majority opinion was denail of the holocaust).

I am not immune to it either. I fucking hated Trudeau for his lackluster reaction to the housing crisis that is effecting me every single day, and his gun laws that are both expensive and ineffective... but at the same when Trump started talking about Annexing Canada and Trudeau said 'not a snowball's chance in hell of Canada becoming the 51st state' I couldn't help but be supportive of him.

Carney's support for the war is not based on humanitarian grounds or the belief that the religious regime should be overthrown because it will result in better lives for the average Iranian. Carney does not give one singular DAMN about the average Canadian at home. I will say it again. He is 100% interested in protecting the economic, military, and political hegemony of western banks over everything else. He will send the entire Iranian population to hell if it meant saving a single dollar for the banks.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago

First of all, Iran is not now, nor has it ever been, interested in acquiring nuclear weapons. I am not talking about some pie-in-the-sky hippie talk on some stoned out guy who doesn’t know what year it is, but this is based on the intelligence reports of the CIA and without question probably MI6, CSIS, the French DGSE and others. There is no nuclear weapons program.

Show me these reports. Otherwise it is just pie-in-the-sky hippy talk.

The JCPOA was a deal Obama made with Iran about... what exactly? If there never was an Iran nuclear program, then what did Obama make a deal with them about?

The rest of your post is just a lot of rambling based on this pie-in-the-sky hippie talk that you're pretending is real.

Iran has a nuclear weapons program. That's been a primary factor in negotiations with Iran for decades. Just do a search there is a lot of information about this.

Here:

https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/06/1164291

Are you claiming the UN is lying about Iran having a nuclear program?

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

They have a nuclear energy program. Not a nuclear weapon program. Also the deal Obama made with them was perfect in that they produced very little of enriched uranium. Once Trump tossed that deal out whatever deal he made only made it easier.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 14 hours ago

You don't enrich uranium to 60% for a nuclear energy program. That's a step you take only for a nuclear weapons program.

When science says one thing and the internet says something else, don't believe the internet.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Iran was attacked out of nowhere, by one of the most incompetent and overconfident militaries on the planet, and now has more power and freedom than it started with. Supporting that invasion is the realm of fools and idiots. Still, within less than 24hrs, he said “we will unconditionally support the US in this war”.

Carney’s “elbows up” was to make ignorant people feel good about themselves while he sells the country out from under us, often times to US-based companies. He’s nothing but a traitor.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago

Ok, so you're just pretending to ignore anything that doesn't fit the narrative you want to believe.

For anyone else that cares about reality:

  • Iran has been purifying uranium beyond what's needed for a civilian reactor
  • Iran doesn't need to purify uranium at all because they purchase uranium from Russia that's already purified to the level needed for their civilian reactor
  • The IAEA reported that Iran was secretly moving uranium to locations that they claimed there wasn't uranium (gieger counters don't lie)
  • Iran has very often officially stated they seek to be an existential threat to Israel
  • Iran also has a ritual where they routinely chant "Death to America"
  • Iran has troll farms engaged in an international propaganda campaign that has been remarkably effective at reaching the youth in the western world which has resulted in violence in western countries (notably the Bondi massacre)
  • Hamas (Iran's proxy) massacred Israeli villages which resulted in a war in which around 75,000 people died.
  • Iran was party to the Syrian civil war in which at least 500,000 people died, and created a refugee crisis for the world

Sure, Trump was an idiot for cancelling the JCPOA in his first term. But that is not an excuse for the horrible things Iran has done. The Iranian narrative is that they would never ever build a nuclear weapon (which is false, there is no civilian use for uranium purifies above 5%) they were just minding their own business (which is false, they've been supporting terrorism across the middle east for decades and trying to spread terrorism into western countries) and there was absolutely no reason for anyone to attack them.

As Carney has said, we should take the world as it is, not how we want it to be.

I wish Trump didn't cancel the JCPOA in his first term. I wish Trump never got elected. I wish Americans understood that by electing Trump a second time, a war with Iran was inevitable. I wish Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. I wish they didn't directly support terrorism in the Middle East. I wish October 7 never happened. I wish Iran's troll farms weren't propagandizing young people. I wish the Bondi massacre never happened.

But that's just wishing, it's not reality. Some of us think about how the world actually is. You're thinking about how you want the world to be. That's why Carney's actions are so confusing to you.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

“As it is, not how we want it to be” wow, you really just completely gave up on hope, huh?

The rest doesn’t change anything, the attacks were completely insane and useless. They did nothing but kill innocent people. The US didn’t talk to anyone else first, they just attacked and expected everyone else to just go along with it.

But that quote? Those are the words of someone who is desperate for people to not fight back against bad ideas that have never worked. Those are the words of someone who wants you reactive instead of proactive. Don’t look forward, just close your eyes and submit to short-term desctruction for corporate profits and further erosion of your rights.

How sad for you.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Hope isn't deluding yourself that there are no problems in the world. Hope is believing that the world can be changed for the better.

The first step to fixing a problem is admitting there's a problem. Once you understand the problem you can then work on solutions to those problems.

I think you have "hope" confused with delusion and apathy. You can go ahead and hope and pray that things will improve and leave it up to the adults to actually improve things for you. Making real positive change involves taking a cold hard look at reality. If you're unwilling to understand reality then you're incapable of making any positive change.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We have admitted there’s a problem. We’ve been screaming about it for decades, actually, and offered myriad solutions backed by studies and experiements, far more than these hyper-capitalist fuck-heads have been able to do. Just because you’re only barely figuring it out now does not mean other people haven’t known for a really long time. Carney is taking us backwards at an alarming pace and investing in yesterday’s dying technology, the very stuff that’s killing us.

The way forward is unions, environmental protections, detaching ourselves from the US, and taxing the hell out of the rich. That is reality, and if you still think Carney will save us you’re beyond delusional.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

And you accused me of being without hope LOL.

We are transitioning to EVs, increasing the power grid. This isn't a fantasy world where we can snap out fingers and oil dependency is instantly gone. We have made a lot of progress in reducing fossil fuels. Peak fossil fuel in regards to electricity generation was last year, for transportation it will be in the next few year.

The US is obviously stupid about this, but we are finally moving forward on the Pathways project, which will decrease CO2 emissions from the oil industry. Depending on how that works we could use it to eventually become carbon negative to offset what the dumbasses to the south of us are doing.

Sorry to be the one to break this to you, but a systems of 100% socialism failed. Badly. In the real world we understand that a system that's a mix of socialism and capitalism works best. Which is what we have. Our healthcare is socialist because there's weird incentives in capitalism when someone's life is on the line. So we don't use capitalism for that. But we know socialism across the board doesn't work either, so we use capitalism where it works. The Government initiates major projects to direct businesses to do what's in the country's interest.

We have a lot of protections for unions in Canada. If you want to form a union, convince your fellow employees, and you have a union. Union busting is illegal in Canada. What do you want the government do everything for you and impose unions onto everyone? It would be insane to have government mandated unions. So if you want a union, then get to work. If you're too lazy to form a union, then that's on you.

You need to work to make the world better, not just sit around posting on the internet nitpicking the people actually doing the work. You can reduce your carbon emissions. You can form a union. You can volunteer your time for charities. You can change the things you buy so you're not buying from the US.

Understand that the internet will tell you about some false ideal world based around failed ideologies of the past, tell you everything is currently terrible, and assign blame on someone for that. Many times it's an ethnic group that the internet will try to blame for that dissent that it made you feel. But whoever you blame for the fact that we don't use failed ideologies (because we want to make things better, not worse) you're spending all of your time assigning blame and not doing anything to actually make things better. Radical right, radical left, it's the same story. The right want a tariff based oligarchy which failed in the past. Leftists want a socialist system that failed in the past. It's all about creating dissent and disenfranchisement over bad ideas not being implemented.

The people actually trying to make a better world get attacked from both sides, by who do nothing other than attack others.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Talk about assumptions acting like I’m doing fuck-all or don’t understand that there is a transition period. You also go off about “socialism has failed” which a clear mark you have zero fucking clue what you’re talking about. Capitalism has failed, it doesn’t support people even remotely equally, and even seeks to make sure that the gap only gets wider, and you don’t give a shit about any of that.

Carney is a regressive piece of shit who’s selling off all our resources and dashing our rights to pieces. Carney literally tried to force the Air Canada strikes to end and, luckily, they told the government to go fuck itself.

You’re just too much of a coward to actually be margainally uncomfortable. Doesn’t help that the only points you have are what the Liberal government spoon feeds you with no actual understanding of what any of it actually means.

Go fuck yourself.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 14 hours ago

No I've read history books about socialism, I know what I'm talking about when I say socialism failed. You should try reading some history books yourself instead of consuming all of your information from social media algorithms which only sow dissent and division.

No system is perfect, and there are problems in our system. But these are solvable problems. Previous generations were able to solve these problems, and there's no reason to think that we can't solve these problems too. It's just a silly internet thing to push for throwing away something that needs maintenance in favour of something that's been proven to be fundamentally flawed.

Go fuck yourself.

You have yourself a nice day too.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

“I’ve read books about socialism” ok, then you’d understand that places like the USSR, the biggest example of communisms failure, nevert actually even reached it. You’d also understand that countries like the Scandanavian ones, which practice a much greater degree of socialism while living under capitalism’s forced influence, are doing a whole lot better than we are. Norway’s sovereign fund and the private corporation hand-out account Carney made are not the same thing, champ. You’d know that Cuba, despite all its been through, has a highly advanced public medical sector and even provides foreign aid there. How does the fact that the CIA has a long history of distabalizing socialist nations not factor into your understanding? What, no maintenance opportunities for the collection of systems that actually seek to care for everyone universally but capitalism gets babied again as if there haven’t been thousands of chances to get it right? It was literally conceived as a way for rich, parasitic nobles to continue feudalism in a world that was rejecting monarchies and you’re over here practcially begging to have their boots shoved down your throat.

To act like capitalism hasn’t failed is completely, batshit insane at this point. The evidence is completely unavoidable unless you’re doing it on purpose because you’re still benefitting and because you don’t consider all the pain it causes to be important because it’s not happening to you enough to care.

You’re just a parasite who doesn’t give a shit about other people. That’s not a political stance, that’s a fucking defect. What a fucking loser.

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Even the CIA said that Iran is not pursuing a nuclear weapon

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Even if Iran was really trying to create nukes, the legal way is to debate it in the security councils than vote on a proposition to stop it not starting a war unitarily

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago

Are you referring to last year when Russian asset and cult member Tulsi Gabbard said they aren't building a nuclear weapon... but also admitted they were enriching uranium to a higher levels? Is that your source? What are they enriching the uranium for, Tulsi?

Yeah, I'm just going to stick with listening to the IAEA (and the basic logic of uranium enrichment above 5% having no purpose other than for a nuclear weapon) and ignore whatever comes out of the US cabinet clownshow.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Every single credible CIA report and reports from other intelligence agencies concur that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons. You are the one falling for lies, not us.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago

Show me them.

If you're going to accuse me of being a liar then show me all of the reports you're basing your claims on.

I have actually searched for this information. I have found reports that do not say what you claim. There are damage assessments on the Iran nuclear program from last year. How could there be damage to a program that doesn't exist? There is testimony to congress about the progress of Iran's nuclear program. So right away your statement that "Every single credible CIA report" is a lie. Might sound convincing to people that won't look up these reports, but it's obviously a lie to anyone that has.

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I am reading statements from the IAEA right now. I haven't seen one that claims Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. Difficult for me to prove that no such statement exists though, so feel free to link one

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

You don't know how to use a search engine? Fine I'll spend ten minutes on this for you.

Here's the page on Iran: https://www.iaea.org/topics/monitoring-and-verification-in-iran

Here's a web page where they mention Iran has 400KG of uranium enriched to 60%:

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-general-grossis-statement-to-unsc-on-situation-in-iran-22-june-2025

We must return to the negotiating table and allow the IAEA inspectors, the guardians of the NPT, to go back to Iran’s nuclear sites and account for the stockpiles of uranium, including, most importantly, the 400kg enriched to 60%.

The IAEA site is kinda shitty and a lot of things is in PDF only, but here's the report from just before the Fordow bombing (Midnight Hammer) last year:

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/25/06/gov2025-25.pdf

First section of the Summary:

  1. While Iran continues to cooperate with the Agency on matters of routine safeguards implementation, in a number of respects as outlined in this report its cooperation with the Agency has been less than satisfactory. In particular, Iran has repeatedly either not answered, or not provided technically credible answers to, the Agency’s questions and has sanitised locations as listed in this report, which has impeded Agency verification activities. The withdrawal of the designation of several experienced inspectors was also not in line with the required spirit of cooperation.

TLDR; IAEA states that Iran had uranium purified to 60% way above the 5% needed for civilian use and they started hiding shit from the IAEA.

How do you explain why Iran would be doing these things? It's a nuclear weapons program, because it involves uranium purified above 5%. That's just science. Why would Iran be hiding things from the IAEA if they had a completely civilian nuclear program? Please apply basic logic.

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

So, the IAEA already knew about this, but the supposed problem is that they put the uranium in a different location after the US canceled the nuclear deal and then started hitting their civilian nuclear facilities with missiles? Ok

also, I can do without the insults btw.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
90 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

12166 readers
647 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS