cross-posted from: https://piefed.zip/c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com/p/1650861/pluralism-go-brrr
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
The shorthand of "libertarianism, but even more ludicrous" sums it up well.
Cool, so you're just ignorant and proudly so. Gotcha.
Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling.
Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one.
Ludicrous, because of it's inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society.
https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html
https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html
Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child.
I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat.
Mhm, sure you have, bubba.
Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling.
I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence.
David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit.
You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books.
I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read.
Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it.
From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist.
Then you understood nothing.
Or we have different perspectives.