137
Ouch. Yikes. 🤦
(thelemmy.club)
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Do you have a link to an article describing the investigation against Ukraine? It’s really difficult to find more info on that via search engines
Here is the notes on the official investigation directly from the ICJ
It's very lengthy, but as of December of last year (2025, if anyone from the future is reading this), the court found that Russia's claims against Ukraine bore merit and that Ukraine had to provide evidence against Russian claims
So far, it's crickets
It's my understanding from reading the various documents there that the court found Russia's claims admissable, ie that the court had juristiction and the claims fall under this case rather than a new case. I'm not a lawyer so struggling to find where they discuss the merit of the claims themselves though. Can you elaborate on this further?
A lot of this is a bit too technical for me to understand it well, but so far I’m understanding that Ukraine asked the court to rule that there was no genocide being committed by Ukraine, and that Russia filed a counter claim to dispute that, which was admitted by the court who requested Ukraine to respons which it hasn’t. I don’t understand if ICJ is actually researching if Ukraine committed a genocide or not, or if it’s just researching whether it can state that definitely no genocide took place.