889
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
889 points (99.4% liked)
Not The Onion
21909 readers
1885 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The face camera is actually a really good idea. And for a few hundred dollars, that driver is not alert let's pull off the road safely could be handled in car, on local models and never have to send any fucking telemetry off to anywhere.
But of course, that info will be sold.
In principle that application of a face camera holds up, subjectively.
In practice that won't be it's primary use case.
It absolutely will bes sold, even if they are banned from saving face profiles directly (which ostensibly they are, for now) it'll just be "anonymous'" data collection. Until they get caught, then they'll pay a cost of doing business tax (fine) and continue on their way.
It's just another vector for creeping changes that invade privacy for the benefit of corporations out the continued tightening population control of governments.
In this case, think ring doorbells + GPS as an opening gambit.
Like how courts orders for "all of the phones in a particular area at a particular time" are a thing, but with a mandatory face cam.
edit : because these are the type of activities that go on at these companies, unchecked mostly.
edit edit : God dammit ford