63
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by sodium_nitride@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

I'm sure some math grad could understand this but like nah this shit above my pay grade.

Ok I'm not being paid at all, but still ...

link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bochner%27s_theorem

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] addie@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago

For a long time, the editors of maths Wikipedia took objection to any 'simplifying' edits to make things more accessible, if they even slightly changed the meaning. Seems like a misunderstanding of what an encyclopedia is for, to me - overview first, expand afterwards. But I suppose mathematicians wouldn't be mathematicians if they weren't borderline obsessive. That first definition is probably more 'correct' although you're quite correct that it's almost unreadable.

Huh. Didn't think that a field needed to have division defined on it, at least not in the 'multiplication is the opposite of division' way you'd expect. Learn something new every day.

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

It needs inverses i suspect

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
63 points (97.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14404 readers
676 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS