63
Some paragraphs on wikipedia are truly heinous
(thelemmy.club)
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
Yeah, math wikipedia is pretty egregious. It's not even that it's for a technical audience, it's more like it's for an audience who already knows the thing. Or it's just someone trying to show off how much jargon they can use to define a thing.
But it can be fixed! Look at the opening paragraph of Field_(mathematics) from 2015
What the fuck is that, right?
And the version now:
For a long time, the editors of maths Wikipedia took objection to any 'simplifying' edits to make things more accessible, if they even slightly changed the meaning. Seems like a misunderstanding of what an encyclopedia is for, to me - overview first, expand afterwards. But I suppose mathematicians wouldn't be mathematicians if they weren't borderline obsessive. That first definition is probably more 'correct' although you're quite correct that it's almost unreadable.
Huh. Didn't think that a field needed to have division defined on it, at least not in the 'multiplication is the opposite of division' way you'd expect. Learn something new every day.
It needs inverses i suspect
At least fields are an easy enough topic so once you see a example it clicks. But for the more niche topics where you really need a simple explanation cause the concept is complicated, the wiki writers will give you a definition that needs a whole degree in math to understand.
Even though the theorem is supposed to be usable by engineers and physicists too (cause you know, we also gotta use this shit to do our work).