Article text:
Darializa Avila Chevalier, the Democratic congressional nominee endorsed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who ousted longtime Rep. Adriano Espaillat in Tuesday’s primary, maintained a since-deleted Twitter account with repeated sympathetic references to communism, Marxist ideology and Soviet figures, including Vladimir Lenin.
Avila Chevalier, a sociology PhD student whose victory sent shockwaves throughout the Democratic establishment, has been under fire for a since-deleted Twitter account, previously reported by CNN, that included phrases such as “seize the means of production,” along with calls to abolish police, prisons and borders. Other controversial tweets include one that said Black and Arab men are both “Fetishizing ugly colonizer women” and another that described wiping her dirty hands on the American flag in lieu of a napkin.
As an undergraduate, Avila Chevalier attended Columbia University, where she organized with Students for Justice in Palestine, and after graduation became involved in pro-Palestinian campus protests over Israel’s war in Gaza. She also attended a controversial October 8, 2023, pro-Palestinian rally in Times Square — one day after Hamas’ attack on Israel — that featured speeches and rhetoric praising the attack.
She previously told CNN, “I have grown considerably in the years since these tweets, and I am focused on our community and our community’s future.”
On Thursday, President Donald Trump accused Avila Chevalier of being a communist, a charge that she said she wouldn’t respond to while on MSNOW, saying, “I won’t be reactive.”
A further review of Avila Chevalier’s archived Twitter account from 2020-2022 found repeated references to communism and Marxist ideology. The account, “Darializabonet,” appears to have been deleted in June 2022.
The account’s bio read in 2020, “how communist of you.” Archived posts and retweets during this timeframe included a recommendation that Karl Marx’s Capital was an “essential must-read,” a complaint that public libraries did not carry enough Marxist literature by Lenin and other revolutionary writers, and a retweet from a Communist-identifying account lamenting that bookstore “banned books” displays did not include The Complete Works of J. V. Stalin.
One archived retweet from 2020 quoted Assata Shakur, the former Black Liberation Army member who, in 1977, was convicted in the murder of a New Jersey state trooper before later escaping prison and fleeing to Cuba. In the quote, Shakur said she “preferred Ho Chi Minh, Kim Il Sung, Che, or Fidel (Castro)” before studying Marx and Lenin because the two “white dudes” had made contributions to “revolutionary struggle” that were “too great to be ignored.”
In April 2020, Avila Chevalier shared a post lamenting that people wouldn’t accept communism over a lack of varieties of soup – a reference to the critique that the political system leads to fewer consumer choices.
“I just cannot get over the fact that the universe has foisted upon us the perfect illustration of literally every failing of capitalism and people are still like we can’t be communists cuz there won’t be enough types of soup,” the post she retweeted read.
Other posts critiqued or joked about popular culture she viewed as anti-communist.
In one post, Avila Chevalier described the animated film Anastasia as “an explicitly anti-USSR kid’s movie,” and in another post she linked to she wrote: “Time for me to once again sympathize with the people the Bolsheviks put in the blender for like 90 min 😌.”
Avila Chevalier was responding to a viral false claim that Disney had removed Anastasia from Disney+ streaming service because it was anti-Russia after the invasion of Ukraine.
In another post, Avila Chevalier joked that Sheryl Crow’s hit song Soak Up the Sun was “bootstrap capitalist propaganda” after noticing it opens with the lyric “my friend the communist,” quipping that the character was “apparently also a bad organizer lol.”
Another 2020 retweet argued for democratic worker control of wealth, dismissing ideological labels by concluding: “You can call that communism, you can call it socialism, you can call it pancakes.”
And previously, CNN had surfaced an April 2020 post where Avila-Chevalier said that while most of the political theory she had read was communist, “the pyromania associated with anarchism is very intriguing to me,” punctuating the remark with a laughing emoji.
Ok I’ll say it: these posts are hilarious. Our first lefty shitposter congressperson
good grief you people will find a way to whine about anything
the level of ambient doomerism on hexbear of late has been on the rise for sure. even just the ability to enjoy a tiny W for what it is seems to be beyond most posters
Personally, I'm in "wait and see" mode. Like, cool, I hope they follow through. It's only very recently that the radical factions have gained this amount of influence in the DSA and they have historically been unable to enforce any sort of coherent party line, since they don't really have one as a big tent organization. So while I'm not doomposting, I think it makes sense to be skeptical.
"I hope they follow through, but let's wait and see" is distinct from the tone of "everybody is a succdem liberal and if you even hope that the DSA libs can do one single good thing you're a liberal idiot. I don't have a tangible suggested alternative BTW but definitely don't join, support, or even pay attention to the DSA liberals" that comes up every week.
I've made jokes about DSA aligned people being the vanguard or above criticism, which they aren't. I would like our community to support a balanced analysis of global politics, including US domestic policy, including criticisms of the liberal tendencies of the Democratic Socialist movement.
It is actually very straightforward to recognize that they are not sufficiently radical/revolutionary to make the substantial changes to undermine US imperialism and capitalism. Pointing that out in a snarky sentence is not interesting and is awarded no points by me. I am curious about what it leads to. How can this energy be appropriated into a stronger revolutionary movement? Is it really just sheepdogging people to the Democratic Party line? (show your work!) What alternatives can one suggest to socialists in the United States, if we dont believe the DSA can get the job done?
One element of answering these questions is definitely "wait and see". Someone can set their expectations bases on their knowledge of history, but the conditions of the United States in 2026 are definitely unique to itself.
For alternatives to electoralism, you can find them even in the DSA, getting droned out by electoralists on a regular basis. There is internal struggle in the DSA, a war of attrition between people smiling at each other and calling each other comrades, seeing who can exhaust the other first on driving a political line and making their priorities into org priorities.
Sometimes (often?) people frame actions add purely mutually exclusive. Either you're doing electoralism and nothing else or something else and definitely not electoralism, so it goes. There is an element of truth to this in that an org has finite human hours with which to do work and that limiting focus to a few priorities is a good way to increase impact. And even if you have 4 priorities, there is a tendency for certain kinds to suck up all of the energy or perhaps appeal to people who think it's the only thing that matters and insults everyone that disagrees. This is an long-recognized tendency. Marx called a version of this parliamentary cretinism (apologies for the problematic terminology) and it is a real thing. But with that said, it is possible to do several things at once and do them well, but it requires a willingness to be self-critical and disciplined in exact opposition to the subject of that term from Marx. That is the key that tends to go missing. DSA electoralists tend to stick to electoralism and try to do things every cycle even if they don't have ideas of what to do - it's just the thing to be doing. Sometimes they succeed, usually they fail, and for reasons that are fairly unserious. And the idea of accepting criticism or imposing discipline on "electeds" tends to be rejected by the exact people so invested in electoralism. I believe these are structural, not incidental issues - if discipline and principles are the antidote, the way to create it through structure is the thing to be doing.
Anyways there are DSA groups focused on:
But they don't make national news because it isn't flashy. And of course other orgs engage in plenty of alternatives to constant electoralism.
Excellent post comrade!
Thanks! Now give me that aforementioned smile! (lol jk)
wait where did we mention that?
Oops here we go :D
also one congresswoman isn't worth much power in the scheme of things, she gets a bigger platform, she might get railroaded out of committee assignments, etc. freshmen congresscritterrs basically never do anything real anyway.
voting against a bunch of shit will be cool but never prevent it.
It's all doomerism and assuming bad faith on the part of every other user (except for infamously bad faith users)
Nah, most people were celebrating when Iran fucked up those military bases and humiliated the US in front of the world. Just because people aren't celebrating what you personally find worthy of celebration doesn't mean there's "ambient doomerism." Imagine using this standard in real life.
wheres the lie