238

After the 2024 presidential election, a person shoved him on the street and began yelling anti-trans slurs. “I’m laying in the street bleeding. Not one person stopped to help me or see if I was okay. And I got up, and I’m bleeding. My hands are bleeding, my knees are bleeding, my face is bleeding.” It was then that he decided he had to leave the country.

‐----------------------------------------

Hefty is part of the record number of LGBTQ+ people in the U.S. fleeing the president’s anti-transgender policies by seeking asylum in other countries, according to a report released last Saturday by the LGBTQ+ asylum relocation assistance group Rainbow Railroad.

Simultaneously, fewer LGBTQ+ refugees from other anti-LGBTQ+ countries are seeking asylum in the U.S., a result of the president’s anti-immigration policies, according to the group’s report, Understanding the State of Global LGBTQI+ Persecution, which was released on World Refugee Day.

Last year, Rainbow Railroad received 20,215 direct requests for relocation assistance from queer and trans people, a 51% increase over 2024 and the highest number of requests the group has received since its founding in 2006.

Approximately 31% of last year’s requests came from people living in the U.S. The previous year, that percentage was about 13%. While past requests to leave the U.S. had in the past predominantly come from queer immigrants who had been resettled in the states, about 88% of the requests in 2025 came from American citizens who said they were fleeing the current administration’s anti-LGBTQ+ policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Dude this shit happens in San Francisco where are you

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Not in fucking California that's what. Thank god for that. I'm around Chicago. Not going to get more specific for obvious reasons, but I'm not Chicago proper

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yeah, I don't get more specific than the Bay Area either. I was aiming for A Cave or Somewhere Small Enough We Know Everyone And Beat The Everloving Shit Out Of Anyone Who Tries To Harm One Hair On Our Beloved Queers' Head, it doesn't seem like there's much middle ground anymore. The problem with moving somewhere large enough to hide in is, well, anyone can hide there.

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago

I live in a city. Not a small town. A small city... Though frankly uptown/gaytown/andersonville in chicago is the best of most worlds.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

large town/small city sizes get fucky out here in california. your small city is probably the same size as my large town. it's really down to the character of the place and that's a very blurry line.

i like places where it's still small enough you get a lot of rural and urban overlap. more people more walks of life meet. The only way i know to force through prejudice is with proximity.

[-] Aneb@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Uptoot for Pittsburgh. Best of both worlds. Really small city with a big city vibe. Lots of restaurants and different neighborhoods with a lot of differential vibes. Also very bike-able, I can bike from Southside to Lawrenceville in 30 mins.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Uh, which one? I've been to CA and PA and they are both great for different (and a few of the same) reasons.

Folk define big and small city as it suits them. Like the folk I would visit out at the farm in Oregon, that town is like 1500 people. They all look like me, we're all related. When I went to church with great gran, they asked where I was from. A town of about [low hundred thousands]. They goggled and exclaimed i was from a big city.

The largest building in town was the hospital back then, which was the only three floor building in my town. Yeah, we have a lot of people but we're packed in tight. Our "downtown", which is currently one block long on one street, did not exist back then. It's less to do with size and more to do with general ambiance.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
238 points (96.9% liked)

politics

30226 readers
2690 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS