this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
85 points (98.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43858 readers
1659 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Are sites like lemmy , reddit and discord the true successors to the old internet forums of the 2000s . or were the forums superior to todays reddit , lemmy or discord

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I never really got the distinction. Reddit was just a massive forums with a lot of subforums. So yeah, there's the difference that it's centralized, but that was a pro in my book.

Now Lemmy/Kbin etc. seem to do the best of both worlds - centralized and decentralized at the same time.

So IMO yes, these sites are the successors. Not Discord, though, that's a non-indexable chat app.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think a big difference is the temporary nature of threads on Lemmy/Reddit. On forums, a new reply pushes a thread back to the front of the page, which leads to discussions that can go on for months or years. On Lemmy, a discussion is active for a few days at most, with the exception of stickied threads. It leads to a different discussion culture and I do sometimes miss that aspect of forums.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Another difference is that on forums you tend to get to know the members if you hang around long enough. On reddit/lemmy I never got this feeling, you're just discussing with random usernames and once the discussion is over, you will probably never run into each other again.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You still get this effect if you are active on specific communities, especially smaller ones.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't say I ever got that from any subreddit, except in the negative way: trolls and overzealous moderators.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Definitely happened in my bump group. But it was maybe 50 active users all going through the same intense thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As a redditor for over 13 years, the smaller communities were one of my favorite parts of the site.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You can still get to know people on reddit. I know some by name. But only on smaller communities that still use the old style flairs, because it's easier to notice that the same type of post is generally attached to the same mini image and then the name gets noticeable.

This effect was entirely gone from medium sized communities and up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel that you get to know the regular users on your instance here pretty well, having a profile picture helps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yea I've been seeing the same few people pop up, honestly wasn't expecting it to be as closeknit on a service like this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think about that a lot. On usenet, I had lots of friends. On modern forums, every conversation is sitting down with a bunch of strangers.

Maybe it's just my memory is shot because I'm old? Ha ha.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like part of that might be the subtly of the avatars here vs forums where people tend to have unique large pictures and signatures

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that exactly what sorting by active is for?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Good point, though I think that also prioritizes threads with a newer creation date? In any case threads seems to die relatively quickly anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If only a minority of users sort by active then it doesn't have the same effect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

When you reply on Lemmy, it may push the thread on top of the Β«activeΒ» filter, so it is similar to forums. Some forums feature voting but to my knowledge none of them has a display algorithm based on votes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As a general rule, I think the things that tend to happen on each kind of Internet platform with user-generated content are mainly the result of how that platform is structured: which posts are shown to whom under what conditions, etc. These are just some examples of this phenomenon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The difference is the voting.

And slight shifts in UI.

But nothing ever really changes. Facebooks current UI is an echo of AOL.