102
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
102 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
863 readers
491 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
loool, I’m still undecided on whether this context makes the post funnier or not.
Push ‘em both into lava.
The "hr would have pushed him into lava" line is the red flag of the tweet. A socialist would not believe that HR is going to be progressive.
The socialist view of HR is that HR exists to protect the capitalist class. HR is there to bust unions and prevent the company owners from getting sued.
It is liberals who believe that HR is a progressive force, whether the liberals be Democrat or Republican.
The "hr would have pushed him into lava" line can only mean 1 of 2 things: either it's a Democrat saying it who believes that HR exists to be progressive or it's a reactionary who believes that HR exists to be progressive (pejorative).
A socialist would not think that HR is going to fire a MRA-type-dweeb.
Thanks for taking my shitpost seriously /genuine
I was reading it as the liberal take before your clarification and do not believe HR would ever be on my side.
i would think/hope if he said that at a radlib-type publication like the intercept he would get fired. probably not by hr though, i guess.