105
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dr. Erica Li, a pediatrician who supports Heywood’s measure to block trans girls from girls’ teams, acknowledged that sports physicals don’t currently require sex verification.

But she noted that other types of exams do, such as annual pediatrician checkups

America is fucking weird. You have pediatricians that fiddle with kids bits once a year and that's supposedly normal? Where the fuck is this happening and why haven't I heard of it before?

[-] Inui@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

It's things like checking for testicular cancer/anomalies, worms, etc. I'd be surprised if other countries don't do that.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not normal over here at all. If you've got a problem and report that problem then sure, you can see a doctor and have a checkup. But annual checkups that include a genital inspection without an actual reason? Completely unnecessary. In fact, annual checkups aren't a thing here either. If you tried to book in "I just want a check up" any UK surgery is going to respond with "Ok what for? What are your symptoms?"

I'm genuinely being culture-shocked by this shit. It's weird as fuck because it's totally unnecessary.

[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

In fact, annual checkups aren't a thing here either.

Maybe start there, because checkups are part of preventative care and much better for public health than waiting to go to the doctor only when something is clearly wrong. I don't have any particularly strong opinion on how checking testicles is handled and if another method would be better, but in the most general terms yes it does make sense to have a medical expert check there (and other places where it's very easy to check for symptoms of severe conditions, e.g. lymph node swelling, which can be in the genitals but also other areas) rather than exclusively rely on the child and parents who are notably not medical experts (though of course they are also given instruction on checking and reporting).

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

If that were true then there would be evidence that stopping them decades ago had a negative impact, but it did not.

[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

I'm confused why something like that could just be flatly asserted. There are lots of articles you can find about underdiagnosis in the UK of conditions that things like generalized regular checks make an effort to find. Aside from the public health topic in a more general sense, could you explain about annual checkups being stopped decades ago? I'd be interested to learn about the history there but I'm having a hard time finding it because I'm pretty bad at this sort of thing.

[-] Sam@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

NHS doctors don't do annual physicals because they barely have time to do direct treatment to seriously engage in preventive measures like that. Go look at private doctors in the UK though and you will find that they all offer these services.

[-] Guamer@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

side thing, but exclusively going to the doctor when an overt symptom emerges can be bad, as stuff like cancer/diabetes/etc can go undetected and fester

[-] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Checking for hernias or major issues once a year at an annual checkup is not sexual assault.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I did not say it was. I said it's weird as fuck. Nobody gets their bits fiddled with over here without an actual reason or symptoms to warrant it.

[-] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In the context of an annual checkup?

It absolutely is not.

Edit: Perhaps it doesn't happen to AFAB but based on anecdotal evidence it was still a common (albeit not annual) thing for AMAB children in the 90s, even in the UK.

https://www.ukhillwalking.com/forums/off_belay/strangeworrying_flashback_from_primary_school-723781

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

You sure that isn't just part of some healthcare privatization and cost-cutting effort? I mean an annual checkup can be just a money-seeking thing so it goes either way but still.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Hernias are not a common issue for children so that still doesn't add up at all

[-] PleasantPeasant@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

they dont even touch your genitals for the hernia check i dont understand what the big deal is

[-] PleasantPeasant@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

american. in my annual checkups there was never any "fiddling" with my genitals, doctor would just check for hernia by asking me to do that cough thing while pressing on my groin but there was no touching of genitals and i dont even remember ever having to pull my pants/underwear down far enough to where the doctor could even see my genitals

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
105 points (100.0% liked)

news

24822 readers
494 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS