51

Malcolm X, born on this day (May 18th) in 1925, was a revolutionary civil rights leader who advocated for black liberation by "any means necessary".

BiographyBorn Malcolm Little, he spent his youth living in a series of foster homes and engaging in petty crime, eventually serving six years in prison for larceny and breaking and entering.

While in prison, Malcolm joined the Nation of Islam (NOI) and adopted the surname "X" to acknowledge his unknown African ancestral name. Malcolm quickly became a leader with the NOI and was paroled in 1952, beginning a period of radical advocacy for black liberation.

In the 1960s, Malcolm X broke with the Nation of Islam, growing disillusioned with its leader Elijah Muhammed. During his 1964 pilgrimage to Mecca, he witnessed Muslims of "all colors, from blue-eyed blonds to black-skinned Africans" treat each other as equals in worship. Because of this, Malcolm X became convinced that Islam could be used as a means to achieve racial equality.

On February 21st, 1965, Malcolm was assassinated in New York City. Three Nation members were charged with the murder and given indeterminate life sentences. Two of these men, Muhammed Abdul Aziz and Khalil Islam, were exonerated in 2021 after a 22-month investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney found that evidence of their innocence, including FBI documents, was withheld at trial.

The Shabazz family are among those who have accused Louis Farrakhan of involvement in Malcolm X's assassination. In 1994, Betty Shabazz was asked if she thought Farrakhan had anything to do with her late husband's death. She replied "Of course, yes. Nobody kept it a secret. It was a badge of honor. Everybody talked about it, yes."

In the wake of his assassination, capitalist press vilified Malcolm X, while media in Africa, China, and Cuba lauded him as a hero and a martyr. The New York Times wrote that Malcolm X was "an extraordinary and twisted man" who "turn[ed] many true gifts to evil purpose", while Time magazine condemned him "an unashamed demagogue" whose "creed was violence."

In contrast, The Ghanaian Times identified Malcolm X as among "a host of Africans and Americans who were martyred in freedom's cause." In China, the People's Daily described him as a martyr killed by "ruling circles and racists" whose death illustrated that "in dealing with imperialist oppressors, violence must be met with violence."

In 2023, The Guardian reported that the Shabazz family announced their plans to sue the FBI, New York Police, and other agencies over Malcom X's death. Ilyasah Shabazz, the third daughter of Malcolm X and Betty Shabazz, announced that new information indicates federal and state agencies “conspired to and executed their plan to assassinate”. Ilyasah added "For years, our family has fought for the truth to come to light concerning his murder and we’d like our father to receive the justice that he deserves."

"Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you're a man, you take it."

  • Malcolm X

I hope you nerds have a good month of April cuddle

Remember no crackers

anti-cracker-aktionqin-shi-huangdi-fireball

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Love to see white “leftists” goo off about sissypee mass surveillance after that Fox News dipshit caught a fine for parking in the bike lane. Most of them are also self-professed “urbanists” constantly complaining about car-centric infrastructure but then whining about authoritarianism 1984 when China does something about it. And they didn’t even bother to fact-check Fox News’ obvious bullshit to find out that you actually get a text to move your car within 15 minutes before you actually get fined, but I guess running interference for sinophobic propagandists is more important. Most Chinese citizens actually support what they call “mass surveillance” but the average cracker is incapable of comprehending the existence of cultural differences.

I’m always happy to explain the reasoning behind why most in China support CCTV but they always call me a sissypee shill before I get to that point. I guess it’s my bad though, not to have realized that John Oliver’s opinion on the Chinese government is far more important than what Chinese citizens think.

[-] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

I’m always happy to explain the reasoning behind why most in China support CCTV

Mind sharing here?

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is just one reason out of many but it is the most representative one. The 80s-90s-early 00s in China was absolutely chaotic. It was not safe to be outside. The most dangerous jobs in the country were taxi driver, long-haul bus driver, and truck driver.

Taxi drivers got robbed and/or killed all the time, and there was even an informal “peak season” for taxi driver killings. I know a cab driver in Beijing, the older model cabs had a barrier that could be activated by foot. The idea was that you would flip the switch if someone was holding a knife to your throat and it would slam up and break their wrist. There was an interview with a medical examiner I saw a while back where she said she hated working in a semi-rural area because that’s where all the bodies of the taxi drivers would get dumped during the aforementioned “peak season”. Homicides in general around this time we’re through the roof relative to today.

For any moderate-length road trip it was almost a coin-flip whether you would be robbed and/or extorted somewhere along the way, possibly multiple times over. There were entire tiny villages that had their economy essentially built on robbing people passing by.

Things reached the worst point in the 90s. There were quite a few bus drivers who refused to work during peak travel season because encountering armed thugs was basically guaranteed. If the long haul bus you were on got boarded and robbed it wouldn’t even make the news. If your entire family got killed on a road trip that wasn’t newsworthy either. If an entire bus full of people got killed it would get mentioned in a summary segment at the end of the evening news. Oh, and calling the cops (or, more realistically, walking overnight to the nearest government office after you get carjacked to report it) was basically a meaningless token gesture.

In the mid-90s the government implemented the “严打” scheme which can be loosely translated as “maximum enforcement”. You can look up pictures from this time; banners were placed all over cities and villages saying that robbers would be shot on sight. Sometimes an ambush would be arranged where they would drive around a fake cargo truck packed with soldiers. However strange it seems to today’s China they would sometimes get into gunfights with robbers.

Around 2002 the government issued a statement that there would be not only be no criminal consequences for killing anyone who tries to intercept or rob a vehicle, but there would also be a financial reward. And unlike FBI rewards they actually paid out. This statement was plastered on every form of public transportation. The official advice was to keep going no matter who or what you hit.

Ancillary to this, traffic in general was a total disaster and basically nobody followed traffic laws. Partially because it was an open secret that you could just bribe the cops to get your license. There was basically no enforcement, although sometimes fake traffic cops would extort money out of you for some made up violation.

This is all within very recent memory (anybody born before 1995). Public safety made a complete 180 from ~2005 to ~2015. Chinese true crime shows went from being about murder all the time to being about guys stealing cones from the road. Nowadays getting robbed on the road is practically unheard of and would be front page news for months on end.

Now, obviously the improvement of material conditions contributed in large part to this, but the proliferation of CCTV technology is credited with this also. Especially in terms of improving clearance rates for solving crimes and basically ending the concept of the police chase in China.

If you go to bilibili and look at the comments of people reacting to the Fox “mass surveillance” segment it’s split between people mocking them for inflating the amount of the fine by 25% (and lying about getting one in the first place) and people talking about what life used to be like.

There is a good bilibili documentary on this. If I have time I’ll sub it and upload it here.

Of course this is not to say what they have in China is what we should aspire to, even in a hypothetical communist utopia. However if this is what Chinese people want for China then I’m not really in any position to say they’re wrong.

Also a little addendum here. Basically every official and their mother was corrupt in the 90s. This is also when the vast majority of many infamous wrongful conviction cases occurred.

The sheer level of corruption and nepotism in 90s-00s China would have turned it into post-soviet Russia 2 had the Xi camp not prevailed and started locking everyone up.

All told there is a reason why most Chinese gangster flicks are set in the 90s. Probably most famously the show 征服 (“Conquer”). China in the 90s vs. today is almost completely unrecognizable.

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago

Huh. Today I learned. Goes to show why the Chinese government is trusted over the US. Taxi drivers still have one of the most dangerous jobs here in the States for the same reason it was dangerous in China. The difference is night and day, however. The only reason taxi murders have declined is because of digital payment, so they aren't carrying as much cash on them compared to the '80s and '90s.

The government has done nothing to protect taxi drivers, especially in areas where they're often immigrants and working class. Statistically, it's more dangerous than being in the US military, yet they don't get any recognition for it.

There is a good bilibili documentary on this. If I have time I’ll sub it and upload it here.

Can you upload it on tankie.tube ? You can upload via link.

[-] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago

Fascinating. China really has changed more in the last 50 years than the US has.

The part about the official advice being to keep driving even if you hit someone because it could be a setup for an ambush reminds me that I remember reading some garbage on Reddit years ago about "in Chiba they hit and run you because evil communists"

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The part about the official advice being to keep driving even if you hit someone because it could be a setup for an ambush reminds me that I remember reading some garbage on Reddit years ago about "in Chiba they hit and run you because evil communists"

Ahh... classic reddit-logo I'm not sure if it's related to officials telling drivers to run highway-robbers over, but in China if you hit a regular pedestrian and then deliberately run them over again you are going from an insurance payout to the death penalty. I cannot recall a single instance of this actually happening that didn't involve preexisting feuds between the people involved or extreme road rage. It's definitely not to save money. So pretty much the same reasons drivers in other countries run people over on purpose. I'm sure they are deliberately misrepresenting government communiques from the highway-robbery era too. The government obviously never recommended that drivers run people over to save money, and they didn't actually change anything in the law. Chinese highway-robbers had zero qualms about killing you even if you gave them everything they wanted. Most of the time they wouldn't, but I doubt any driver was willing to take that bet. The 2002 statement didn't change the law, it just emphasized that running armed thugs over was considered justified self defense. This was necessary because there was a lot of ambiguity about how far you could go before it was considered overboard.

[-] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I’m always happy to explain the reasoning behind why most in China support CCTV but they always call me a sissypee shill before I get to that point.

I'd love to hear about that reasoning. It sounds very different from how I'd feel, but I'm in an ameriKKKan context where I hate that there's recording all around which the genocidal government of the Fourth Reich can use

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

See my reply to MarxMadness; happy to take any questions

[-] SmithrunHills@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

Seriously, fuck John Oliver. Any self-proclaimed "leftist" who props him up gets the gulag once the revolution comes.

this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
51 points (100.0% liked)

Ethnic Minorities and People of Color

1642 readers
19 users here now

Official Title of this Community: Ethnic Minorities and People of Color

Why is the title different?

We like to have fun here.

What is this place? A safe space for underrepresented peoples and peoples of color to talk, chill, and vibe.

What are the basic rules of the community?

  1. Follow Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines. Non negotiable. This is the bedrock and mods will make decisions with this always in mind.

  2. This community is for ethnic minorities and people of color. This is a safe space where such people can freely discuss their struggles, insight, and thoughts without fear. If you are not, we respectfully ask you do not post or comment here. A future community will be established to allow for racial discussions with a mixed userbase. However, remember, comments here must still respect Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines.

  3. Irony Racism is still racism. Racism is bad m'kay? We will treat irony racism and bad faith racist satire as racism. Will wield the ban hammer accordingly.

  4. No sectarianism: This is an identity channel not a channel for you all to complain about why XYZ isn't the "one true leftism". Take that to another place.

  5. Stupidpol is not allowed. Stupidpol is class reductionist. We are an identity community. Thinking like stupidpol ignores the struggles of the oppressed, their voices, and their need for unique support. Nothing says oppression more than someone saying that the identity you have is "not real" and that if you only thought like them you'd see what your "real" identity is. Mods reserve the right to ban users and content who promote stupidpol, stupidpol memes, and other class reductionist thinking.

FAQ

I don't look XYZ and/or sometimes I can pass as white so I don't know if I can post here. Can I?

What can I post?

Suggested Posts

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS