A “core” group of European countries should work with allies to boost innovation and collectively counter the growing dominance of the US and China, a Nobel Prize-winning economist has said.
Philippe Aghion argued that willing EU countries should deepen economic and research ties with like-minded partners, such as Canada, to help shape a geopolitical order increasingly being driven by Washington and Beijing.
“We should have a core set of countries, including Canada and possibly Singapore and others… who embrace common values,” said Aghion, who won the 2025 Nobel Prize for his work on innovation and economic growth.
“And then the core can decide to make deals with the US, with China, with others,” Aghion added. “But we [the EU] are the centre.”
...
“If all 27 countries are willing to play the game, [that’s] for the better,” he told journalists on the sidelines of last week’s Brussels Economic Forum. “But you cannot wait until everybody is on board.”
However, Aghion rejected the suggestion that endorsing such a coalition was tantamount to backing a ‘two-speed Europe’, an idea sporadically supported by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
“Those who want to move faster should be able to move faster,” he said.
...
Aghion also argued that recent political shifts – including former Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s electoral defeat – could accelerate EU efforts to deepen economic coordination and strengthen the bloc’s strategic autonomy.
...
However, Aghion warned that major structural obstacles still prevent Europe from becoming a global innovation hub.
Among them, he said, is Europe’s deep aversion to industrial policy, at a time when both the US and China are investing heavily in strategic sectors.
Brussels has focused “too much on carbon tax and not enough on green industrial policy”, Aghion said. “In the name of competition policy, we precluded industrial policy.”
He also blamed parts of the EU’s regulatory framework for the bloc’s weak performance in growth and innovation.
The EU’s rules are “not designed to boost innovation” but rather “to help us avoid fighting each other”, he said. “Now we have to rely on ourselves, and we need to innovate. Because if we don’t innovate, it will be China and the US making the calls.”
...
What is weird?
If the EU hasn't taken action by now to innovate, how can we trust it to make the right decisions in the future?
I for one definitely would prefer guided economic development over the free market. All that does is iterate on the same pointless, low quality crap nobody really needs any more. I'd rather the government directs the relevant economic sectors, either directly or through specific financial incentives.
From where does the government get the people who make the right decisions? The USSR had spent all their resources on weapons and didn't develop consumer products enough. They had industrial policy in its purest form.
Where do corporations get those people? I'm not asking for the fucking soviet union bro. I just want the government to force the industry to make future proof decisions instead of just profitable ones. Which is why the car industry for example has spent decades iterating on the same obsolete concept of ice cars instead of innovating, and now they cry foul. Same goes for all the economic sectors ran by private profiteers such as energy.