518
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/til@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Steve@communick.news 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Because the government is subsiding those cars in a number of different ways; Attempt to control the global automotive and clean energy markets.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 56 points 3 days ago
[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 days ago

And the oil industry and builds the roads and fights the wars to acquire oil.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

They actually build roads??

[-] Steve@communick.news 7 points 3 days ago

Not to the same degree, or with the same goals.
US subsidies are simply about corporate profits. China's are about over-producing and lowering prices to incentivize global adoption.

Forks and knives are both silverware, but very different.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

you also don't eat your food with a 10" chef knife.

[-] No1@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

How about them tarrifs, though!

[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

And because wages are lower as well. Manpower costs more in America than China by quite a bit. The article doesn't scale prices to purchasing power. It's not 5x as much anymore probably, but it's a significant amount.

[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 8 points 3 days ago

My guess is that manpower share is probably not that significant in the price of an EV.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Ni, its pretty much all machine and robot made.

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

Almost all costs come down to wages when you look at the economy of an entire country. The car factory pays wages and materials (grossly simplified to illustrate what I mean). The supplier they buy the materials from pays wages and raw materials. The place those raw materials come from pays wages and their own raw materials. And so on. At the end there's some guy in a mine swinging a pickaxe who's paid, you guessed it, a wage. (again, grossly simplified for illustration. Of course they use modern machinery, of course the supply chains are networks and not straight lines....).

So when you produce in a country with a vastly lower level of wages, everything gets cheaper. The car maker doesn't only pay less in wages, they also pay less for steel sheets, cables, cloth and leather for seats, you name it, because those suppliers pay lower wages too.

[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago

Almost all costs come down to wages when you look at the economy of an entire country.

Yes. There is the matter of productivity somewhere in between, which is mainly linked to innovation and past capital expenses.

they also pay less for steel sheets, cables, cloth and leather for seats

Not really. These are already procured externally in a globalized world where manufacturing already left to low-wage places

[-] StillAlive@piefed.world 1 points 3 days ago

My guess is that manpower share is probably not that significant in the price of an EV.

It's not about wages being part of price.

It's about wages being aspect of buyers.

[-] InternationalHermit@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

I occasionally watch an American YouTuber married to a Chinese man, living in china, and they can’t afford a car (my observation, she claims they don’t need one). They have recently upgraded to a bigger electric scooter as their family car.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

Most Chinese cities have extremely high registration fees which make car ownership impractical for most people. They also have great public transportation which tilts the calculus towards not needing a car if affordability is even remotely a concern.

[-] krisevol@lemmus.org 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And they are winning. China is expected to dominate 4 of the top 5 auto manufacturer by 2030

[-] bright@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

I assume you meant "dominate"

[-] krisevol@lemmus.org 3 points 3 days ago

Got to love swipe texting

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

Wow they really are turning communist after all!

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

oh yeah....the 8 billion dollars to Detroit subsidy is why they make all those cool, highly efficient cars.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 2 days ago

Not all subsidies are done for the same reason. Keep reading my other comments down that thread.

[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Seems like a missed opportunity by everybody else.

[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Sorry, option not recognized. Listen carefully as our options have recently changed (weekly). Please choose from the following available ones:

  1. Kidnap foreign leaders we don't like and other threats to independent governments.
  2. Fund genocide.
  3. World wide inflation with this one simple trick (Strait of Hormuz).
  4. Look ma! No diapers (includes diapers).
  5. 1st amendment (billionaires only).
  6. Insider trading (WH friends & family only).
  7. All of the above (includes special bonuses and 1 meme coin!)
[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Subsidizing practical applications of clean energy seems like a moral good to me.

Are they attempting to control the market? Even if they are the solution is to produce a more competitive product, not sit on one's hands or double down on ICE vehicles.

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Are they attempting to control the market?

Absolutely!
A competitive product isn't the problem. It's the fact that they're intentionally pricing the cars below cost, loosing money on every vehicle. Once there's no real competition, they can leverage that market monopoly to to gain others, or simply increase prices well beyond what they naturally would be. Just like Amazon did with diapers and other markets.

[-] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

That's very nice of them to make stuff cheaper for me. If only my government wouldn't tack on 100% tariffs.

[-] Steve@communick.news 6 points 3 days ago

It's not. They aren't doing it for charity.
It's just like when Amazon sold diapers at a loss. Once all the competition is gone, and China has the global monopoly they want, they'll use it to inflate prices even higher, or for leverage on other markets.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

How could they?

For shame... Only American technology companies are allowed to do that.

[-] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I love that that story of Amazon selling diapers is the most salient example of what economists literally call "dumping".

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
518 points (93.3% liked)

Today I Learned

29586 readers
377 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS