view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
One of the main considerations when my wife and I got our larger car was all the other larger cars in the road. Nobody wants to be on the receiving end of texting soccer mom’s Escalade in a subcompact.
Are there actual studies proving that the risk to your life is truly meaningfully increased, more than lets say by voluntarily mildly speeding or being distracted by talking to others in the car etc? To me this sounds a lot like paranoia where people are readily increasing the lethal risk for others (pedestrians, especially children, cyclists etc) for mildly reducing their own risk and then they use all kind of feel good ideas to justify that to themselves.
I don’t feel like one should need a study to tell them which will win between a 2000lbs car and a 4000lbs truck that sits higher. But here you go:
Source
That's not a study, it is a quote from a local news source (that can't even manage to be not blocked in Europe). The quote is also oddly unspecific and the subsequent example given is of an outdated car with lacking safety features, not sold like that anymore.
Anyhow, if big cars are the problem, than the solution is not to increase the problem but to regulate deadly big cars. Why do you think car traffic lethalities in Europe are actually decreasing, even though cars are getting bigger, while in the US there is a stark increase in road lethalities even though most people are driving oversized and overweight cars?
Kelley Blue Book isn’t a local news source, or even a news source at all. They specifically deal with cars.
The article was about a yearly study done by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Here is an even more primary source.
Since I control the world I’ll get right on making sure everybody else has a smaller car and not doing what I can currently to about my wife’s safety on the road.
Seriously, why are you even taking this position?
Ad 1: It is blocked in the EU. Usually only local offers with little international presence can't be bothered to be GDPR compliant and block their site for the EU.
Ad3: Have you looked at your source? It looks quite a bit different from the undifferentiated claim that driving small cars leads to a "high" chance of death in an accident. Even the smallest cars have not become more dangerous than in the past. The opposite is the case, they have gotten safer even with all the oversized cars around and are nowadays safer than big cars were in 2000. What is also shown in the graph is that the longest cars (relative to width) had lower death rates but only the very longest. 2/3 of the graph show no change that looks larger than the fluctuation. The trend line is having a very poor correlation with the data points.
At the same time the death rates due to traffic accidents are exploding recently in the US. So you are trading a bit of extra safety for yourself for more deaths of others on the roads. No you don't need to control the world. Driving safely in a car of any size is what signficantly reduces your risks for you and for others. All modern cars are very safe. Moderately oversized cars are not safer at all, extremely oversized cars are a bit safer but much unsafer for everyone else. Your choice.
Honestly, people driving huge vehicles are usually distracted by their phones and the amount of accidents dt that are pretty high. They hit pedestrians and cyclists (both bicycles and motorbikes) as well as other autos. One has to be very alert. There are also the assholes who speed weaving in and out of traffic cutting you off that you have to be alert to. Additionally, we have a lot of drivers under the influence since pot became legal.
That relativism is just false. There are very meaningful differences between tall oversized SUVs and non-oversized regular cars. First of all, sight is significantly worse, seeing pedestrians, especially children is harder and when an accident occurs the likelihood of the victim being pushed below the car instead of landing on the hood is much higher. All of that leads to significantly higher lethality rates with SUVs, not because people in there are more distracted but because SUVs are more deadly in case of accidents and make it harder for drivers to avoid accidents.