584

Last year the U.S. experienced something that hasn’t definitively occurred since the Great Depression: More people moved out than moved in. The Trump administration has hailed the exodus—negative net migration—as the fulfillment of its promise to ramp up deportations and restrict new visas. Beneath the stormy optics of that immigration crackdown, however, lies a less-noticed reversal: America’s own citizens are leaving in record numbers, replanting themselves and their families in lands they find more affordable and safe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 64 points 22 hours ago

I wonder if just like Brits and French, Unitedstaters emigrating elsewhere will call themselves "expats" instead of immigrants.

We, white people of the west, can go anywhere in the world for work, affordability and/or safety without considering ourselves immigrants.

Many years ago I was chatting with someone from Malmö. He was complaining how immigrants were "taking over his city". But when I mentioned that I, a Canadian, would also like to move to Sweden, he told me it would be fine, that he would not consider me "an immigrant" because I'm from the west.

Anyway, I understand why anyone would want to leave. It's just that it seems the vocabulary used is different for different people.

[-] Greddan@feddit.org 5 points 1 hour ago

Expat means that your intention isn't to settle down and stay.

Personally I'm not thrilled with how many immigrants to Sweden are raving religious lunatics. We spent 1000 years under the oppression of one of these insane sects (Christianity) and have enjoyed our freedom immensely.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

will call themselves “expats” instead of immigrants.

They do, all the time.

[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I moved to Germany from the US and make a point of calling myself an immigrant to tackle this very thing. Honestly I haven't heard expat used by anyone besides contractors looking to go back home after the duration, but that's anectodal.

[-] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 10 points 16 hours ago

They already do that in Mexico, they call themselves expats in their Facebook groups and complain about the locals

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 37 points 21 hours ago

I’m an American immigrant in Germany. It’s infuriating how many Germans complain to me about immigrants, then when hearing that I’m an immigrant, wave their hand and say I’m not like the others. I’m now a German teacher and married to a German, so they’ve always got plausible deniability that it’s about language or integration, but I wasn’t always good at German and I only met my husband after a few years here. It used to be much more fun to push back on why.

[-] themaninblack@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

Daaamn. You moved to a foreign country and became a teacher of their language in said country? Jesus that’s an almost pornographic level of integration. Almost like a flex.

I was German club president in high school and I could not even fathom doing this. Kudos.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

I mean, to be fair, it’s not German literature, I’m teaching German as a second language. I’m a big proponent of dual native/nonnative language teaching, because native speakers (almost) always know what’s right and nonnative speakers (almost) always know why. I think of it like having a math teacher who’s a prodigy vs one who struggled with math- both are useful to have for different reasons.

My German’s not perfect, but it’s very good (C2) and it’s good enough to teach new speakers, I just let them know that I also make mistakes.

[-] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago

Try immigrating to Canada from the US. Nobody here would ever consider me a 'true' immigrant, even though that is quite literally what I am.

I moved for school and never came back. All my family and personal ties were left behind in the states. Except for my family and the annoying need to file taxes every year for some fucking reason, I have no ties left to the US.

But Im white and culturally similar enough that the label 'immigrant' would feel funny to people here. It really is wacky.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Why pay taxes to the US? Is it an extraditable offense?

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 11 points 18 hours ago

You have to file taxes with the US, most people with US citizenship living outside the US don't actually have to pay anything.

As for why to keep filing:

  • renouncing your citizenship is difficult and expensive
  • it's hard to avoid the US

Let's say you have no plans to ever live in the US again. Does that mean you never want to visit friends or family you left behind? Does that mean you'll never go to a sporting event, concert or professional conference in the US ever again? If you're flying internationally, will you always be willing to pay extra and do extra work to avoid being on a plane that makes a stopover in the US?

For most people it's a few hours of work, and/or a hundred bucks or so once per year to keep their options open and avoid major headaches.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

a stopover in the US?

Most civilized countries' airports have transit areas for just this purpose, you don't tecnically enter the country.
Oh, we're talking about Murica, nevermind.

[-] Technoworcester@feddit.uk 2 points 13 hours ago

If you're flying internationally, will you always be willing to pay extra and do extra work to avoid being on a plane that makes a stopover in the US?

Yes. All the yes. Sod all legal rights when in an airport. Not worth the risk.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Thanks for the well laid out response. I learned a lot, and my assumption on renouncing citizenship were along the same lines as:

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, it's more: "Oh, you want to renounce? Guess we better audit your last 5 years of tax returns with a fine-toothed comb." In addition, you have to do two separate interviews with US officials, plus pay a $2.5k USD fee. Plus, you might be hit with an exit tax if you have any wealth -- and that includes retirees who are counting on using that wealth for their retirement.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 9 points 21 hours ago

It's rather simple, they see you as sharing their same culture, so they consider you part of their tribe, while others appear to them as being too different, implying cultural friction and danger.

[-] HobbitFoot 1 points 19 hours ago

You aren't a Turk?

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

We just left the US at the beginning of the year, and so we've been thinking about this sort of thing a lot. The short answer is, before we thought about it, we were referring to ourselves as "expats." But just last week I saw someone online mention that, as a rule, people moving from rich countries are called "expats" while people moving to rich countries are called "immigrants."

That one did my head in a bit. Had to rethink some stuff.

[-] innermachine@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

An expat is not an immigrant. An immigrant emigrates to a different country, like my mother who was born in Venezuela but earned her citizenship in the USA. An expat is somebody who moves to another country for work temporarily, and does NOT emigrate. Think of immigration as permanent and expat as temporary (think work visa for a few years then back home, or transfered somewhere else)

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 hours ago

Actually i think it's the other way around, an expatriate is expected to renounce native citizenship and may have left for exile.

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Oh a migrant gotcha

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 16 points 20 hours ago

that he would not consider me “an immigrant” because I’m from the west.

I've lived in 7 countries - and still living in a foreign country now - and I've heard the same thing from many locals in all the countries I've lived in.

It's not because you're from the West that you'd be an acceptable immigrant, it's because you're white. From the way you're telling the same story I've heard a million times myself, I'm 99% certain you're as white as I am.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

It’s not because you’re from the West that you’d be an acceptable immigrant, it’s because you’re white.

It's because you're rich.
If you're poor then you're a filthy immigrant.

[-] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Yep. When I visit my girlfriend's family in Peru, I get looks because I'm mixed Caucasian (white skin but some asian features) and definitely not Latino. When I stayed in Germany, or visited Austria or Switzerland, I did not get the same looks or attitudes. I've been around, and I've found a lot of people's initial attitudes towards you depends on how similar or different you are to them at face-value.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

It might be assumed that it is easier for people within Western countries to assimilate in another Western country? It's often not actually true, I imagine, and probably really comes down to the individual.

[-] halowpeano@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

No, it's racism. Always has been.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 8 points 21 hours ago

Your associate is racist. You should tell them.

[-] HobbitFoot 5 points 19 hours ago

It depends on who.

For immigrants changing their mind, they are either going to approach it as moving back to their old country or being an immigrant in the new country.

For most native born Americans who I know who did or will, they will also likely self identify as immigrants.

It will be the elderly moving to Latin America to retire who will likely refer to themselves as "expats".

[-] mycatsays@aussie.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

I grew up in the USA and live in Australia. I think of and refer to myself as both 'expat' and 'immigrant'.

Which word I use depends on context. I'm an American expat (context: my relationship with USA), but I'm an immigrant in Australia (context: my relationship with Australia).

I guess I'm really just using "expat" to mean "emigrant". ¯_(ツ)_/¯

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
584 points (99.2% liked)

politics

28579 readers
2641 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS