▲ 600 ▼ TIL You can leagally drop your baby off at the fire station in all 50 states (en.wikipedia.org) submitted 6 months ago by so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zip to c/til@lemmy.world 209 comments fedilink hide all child comments Pretty wild! All states give you at least 30 days to dump your baby, no strings attached. Some states give you 60 days! I feel like more people should know about this! It seems like a highly under utilized ability.
[–] Carighan@piefed.world 42 points 6 months ago (3 children) I'm more concerned how he had ten kids and then felt overwhelmed when his wife left him. Like what the fuck?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago (1 child) Grieving for a partner definitely doesn't make it easier to raise your children?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago And I've not met many men with 10 kids who are super into doing the whole "dividing the labor of parenting evenly" thing, and I went to catholic schools, I knew some big families. And even if he had been the type to do that, you aren't winding up being the breadwinner for a family with 10 kids and having both low stress finances and a low stress job. So adding in lots of extra home duties and possibly reduced financial capabilities and mourning will probably wreck you. That said, I've never met a family that large where the parents kept actually parenting beyond number 3 or 4. Some of the most horrifically parentified people I ever met were middle daughters of large families. Also the kids are struggling too, and each of them is likely to have taken some lasting psychic damage from being abandoned by their dad, even temporarily, shortly after their mom died. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 6 months ago (1 child) Because he didn't do Jack raising them probably permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 36 points 6 months ago (2 children) Or doubling the responsibilities was too much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago Double it and pass it to the next person permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 6 months ago (1 child) If doubling was to much, it would have been enough to "only" drop 4-5 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 child) As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed. But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he's a man. Have fun with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -10 points 6 months ago (1 child) What has him being a man to do with all that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HobbitFoot 20 points 6 months ago Died, not left. And likely yeah, someone would get overwhelmed doing two peoples' jobs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago (1 child) Grieving for a partner definitely doesn't make it easier to raise your children?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago And I've not met many men with 10 kids who are super into doing the whole "dividing the labor of parenting evenly" thing, and I went to catholic schools, I knew some big families. And even if he had been the type to do that, you aren't winding up being the breadwinner for a family with 10 kids and having both low stress finances and a low stress job. So adding in lots of extra home duties and possibly reduced financial capabilities and mourning will probably wreck you. That said, I've never met a family that large where the parents kept actually parenting beyond number 3 or 4. Some of the most horrifically parentified people I ever met were middle daughters of large families. Also the kids are struggling too, and each of them is likely to have taken some lasting psychic damage from being abandoned by their dad, even temporarily, shortly after their mom died. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago And I've not met many men with 10 kids who are super into doing the whole "dividing the labor of parenting evenly" thing, and I went to catholic schools, I knew some big families. And even if he had been the type to do that, you aren't winding up being the breadwinner for a family with 10 kids and having both low stress finances and a low stress job. So adding in lots of extra home duties and possibly reduced financial capabilities and mourning will probably wreck you. That said, I've never met a family that large where the parents kept actually parenting beyond number 3 or 4. Some of the most horrifically parentified people I ever met were middle daughters of large families. Also the kids are struggling too, and each of them is likely to have taken some lasting psychic damage from being abandoned by their dad, even temporarily, shortly after their mom died. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 6 months ago (1 child) Because he didn't do Jack raising them probably permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 36 points 6 months ago (2 children) Or doubling the responsibilities was too much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago Double it and pass it to the next person permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 6 months ago (1 child) If doubling was to much, it would have been enough to "only" drop 4-5 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 child) As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed. But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he's a man. Have fun with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -10 points 6 months ago (1 child) What has him being a man to do with all that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 36 points 6 months ago (2 children) Or doubling the responsibilities was too much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago Double it and pass it to the next person permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 6 months ago (1 child) If doubling was to much, it would have been enough to "only" drop 4-5 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 child) As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed. But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he's a man. Have fun with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -10 points 6 months ago (1 child) What has him being a man to do with all that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago Double it and pass it to the next person permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 6 months ago (1 child) If doubling was to much, it would have been enough to "only" drop 4-5 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 child) As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed. But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he's a man. Have fun with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -10 points 6 months ago (1 child) What has him being a man to do with all that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 child) As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed. But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he's a man. Have fun with that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -10 points 6 months ago (1 child) What has him being a man to do with all that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -10 points 6 months ago (1 child) What has him being a man to do with all that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de -6 points 6 months ago (1 child) I don't think there is enough background story to think the mother would have been a much better parent, giving up ALL children permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) The fact that you can claim you need more information if it was a gender reversal, is exactly what they were pointing out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child) Not exactly. They're basically saying that both genders would be bad parents by default for giving up all of their kids unless there was evidence of a compelling reason to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Id like to see ANYONE be able to manage 10 children alone, during a custody battle, and still needing to work/provide for all 11 of you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 6 months ago I'm not agreeing with their point, just clarifying what they were saying. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HobbitFoot 20 points 6 months ago Died, not left. And likely yeah, someone would get overwhelmed doing two peoples' jobs. permalink fedilink source parent